Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

Ernie Smith and Jama! Sims are analysts with the firm of Madison Consultants. Madison provides statistical modeling and advice to portfolio managers throughout the United States and Canada.

In an effort to estimate future cash flows and value the Canadian stock market. Smith has been examining* the country's aggregate retail sales. He runs two autoregressive regression models in an attempt to determine whether there are any patterns in the data, utilizing nine years of unadjusted monthly retail sales data. One model uses a lag one variable and the other adds a lag twelve variable. The results of both regressions are shown in Exhibits 1 and 2.

Sims has been assigned the task of valuing the U .S . stock market and uses data similar to the data that Smith uses for Canada. He decides, however, that the data should be transformed. He takes the natural log of the data and uses it in the following model:

Smith and Sims are concerned that the data for Canadian retail sales may be more appropriately modeled with an ARCH process. Smith states, that in order to find out, he would take the residuals from the original autoregressive model for Canadian retail sales and then square them.

Sims states that these residuals would then be regressed against the Canadian retail sales data using the

where e represents the residual terms from the original regression and X represents the Canadian retail sales data. If is statistically different from zero, then the regression model contains an ARCH process.

Smith also examines the quarterly inflation data for an emerging market over the past nine years. He models the data using an autoregressive model with a lag one independent variable which he finds is statistically different from zero. He wonders whether he should also include lag two and lag four terms, given the magnitude of the autocorrelations of the residuals shown in Exhibit 4, assuming a 5% significance level. The critical t-values, assuming a 5% significance level and 35 degrees of freedom, are 2.03 for a two-tail test and 1.69 for a one-tail test.

where: FF is the Federal Funds rate in the United States (US), and BY is the bond yield in the European Union (E) and Great Britain (B).

Before he runs this regression, he investigates the characteristics of the dependent and independent variables. He finds that the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in Great Britain have a unit root but that the bond yield in the European Union does not. Furthermore, the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in Great Britain are cointegrated but the Federal Funds rate in the United States and the bond yield in the European Union are not.

Which of the following models would be the best formulation for the Canadian retail sales data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

First, calculate the continuously compounded risk-free rate as ln( 1.040811) = 4% and then calculate the theoretically correct futures price as follows:

Then, compare the theoretical price to the observed market price: 1.035 - 1,025 = 10. The futures contract is overpriced. To take advantage of the arbitrage opportunity, the investor should sell the (overpriced) futures contract and buy the underlying asset (the equity index) using borrowed funds. Norris has suggested the opposite. (Study Session 16, LOS 59.f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Aliza
16 days ago
As an analyst, I'm always tempted to try the fanciest models, but sometimes the simplest approach is best. I think I'll go with Option A - it may not be the most sophisticated, but it seems to fit the data pretty well. Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind if the ARCH model turns out to be a real game-changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
21 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of model selection - do we go for simplicity or complexity? I say we flip a coin and let fate decide. Or maybe we should just ask the magic 8-ball, it's bound to give us a more reliable answer than we could come up with!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B with the additional lag twelve variable might be worth considering, especially since the data has a seasonal component. But the ARCH model does seem like it could be the most appropriate based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
22 days ago
Considering the seasonal component, Option B with the lag twelve variable could be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
23 days ago
The ARCH model might be the most appropriate for the Canadian retail sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
28 days ago
Option B with the additional lag twelve variable could capture the seasonal component.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
1 months ago
I disagree, I think Option A - the simple autoregressive model with a lag one variable - is the best choice. The results look pretty good, and we don't need to overcomplicate things with an ARCH model unless it's really necessary.
upvoted 0 times
Ena
30 days ago
I agree, keeping it simple with the autoregressive model makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 months ago
I think Option A is the best choice. The results are solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latonia
1 months ago
I think the best model would be Option C - the ARCH model. The residuals from the original autoregressive model for Canadian retail sales show evidence of heteroscedasticity, so an ARCH model would be more appropriate to capture the time-varying volatility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
What makes you think Option C is better than Option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the best choice for modeling the Canadian retail sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
I think Option A would be the best formulation for the Canadian retail sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
But Option A seems to have a more robust model based on the regression results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the best choice based on the data provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 months ago
I think Option A would be the best formulation for the Canadian retail sales data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel