Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

An IoT systems administrator needs to be able to detect packet injection attacks. Which of the follow methods or technologies is the administrator most likely to implement?
B) Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)
A) Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
C) Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
D) Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) with Authentication Headers (AH)

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT systems administrator needs to be able to detect packet injection attacks. Which of the follow methods or technologies is the administrator most likely to implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Nickolas at Dec 10, 2023, 03:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rebbecca
10 months ago
I thought AH was better for integrity checks? Confused!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
11 months ago
L2TP is decent, but not as strong as IPSec options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
Wait, isn't PPTP still used by some? Seems outdated though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
11 months ago
Totally agree, it's more secure than the others!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
11 months ago
IPSec with ESP is the way to go for packet injection detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards IPSec with ESP too, but I wonder if there's a better option among the choices given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different tunneling protocols, and I think IPSec with ESP was highlighted for its security features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
12 months ago
I think we discussed how IPSec with AH might provide some level of integrity, but I can't recall if it's the best for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
12 months ago
I remember studying IPSec, but I'm not sure if ESP is the right choice for detecting packet injection attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
12 months ago
PPTP and L2TP aren't really designed for detecting packet injection, so I don't think those would be the best options for this IoT system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
12 months ago
IPSec with AH would also work for detecting packet injection, but ESP provides more comprehensive protection by encrypting the data as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think through the different VPN protocols and their security features to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
12 months ago
I think IPSec with ESP is the best choice here since it provides encryption and integrity protection to detect packet injection attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. A conformance-based specification is best when there are clear, objective criteria to evaluate the suppliers' solutions. That points me towards option D as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different incident management scenarios carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Converting to NTFS will give us file-level security, and the third-party encryption should handle the data encryption and security. As long as the encryption software allows for recovery, I think we're good to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 year ago
I wonder if the exam question author has been watching too many hacker movies. Packet injection attacks sound like something straight out of a cyberpunk thriller. But hey, gotta stay on top of that IoT security!
upvoted 0 times
Reena
1 year ago
C) Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP)
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
1 year ago
B) Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP)
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
1 year ago
A) Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
1 year ago
Wait, so we're trying to stop people from injecting packets into our IoT system? I hope they're not trying to turn our toasters into part of a botnet or something. IPSec to the rescue!
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
1 year ago
Yeah, we definitely need to make sure our toasters stay safe from being hijacked!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 year ago
I think IPSec with ESP would be the best choice to protect our IoT system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
D) Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) with Authentication Headers (AH)
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
1 year ago
A) Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
1 year ago
IPSec with AH could also work, but I think ESP is the better choice as it provides both encryption and integrity protection. Can't go wrong with a classic like IPSec!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
1 year ago
I'm not sure PPTP or L2TP would be the best choice here. Those protocols are more focused on creating secure tunnels, not necessarily detecting packet injection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
1 year ago
IPSec with ESP seems like the most relevant option to detect packet injection attacks. It provides encryption and integrity protection for the data being transmitted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think PPTP and L2TP are not as secure as IPSec with ESP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
I agree with Eden, IPSec with ESP provides encryption and authentication to detect packet injection attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 years ago
I think the administrator would implement IPSec with ESP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel