New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Certinia PSA-Sysadmin Exam - Topic 4 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Certinia's PSA-Sysadmin exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 4
[All PSA-Sysadmin Questions]

Your company has both full time and part time resources. From a Human Resources perspective, part time resources can work any number of hours per week. From a Resource Planning perspective, management has agreed that part time workers can be estimated at 20 hours per week.

Based on this information, how many work calendars should be created?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lore
3 months ago
Not sure if 20 hours is realistic for all part timers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
3 months ago
Yeah, option B makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
3 months ago
Surprised there's not a generic calendar option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
4 months ago
I think just one part time calendar is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
Definitely need one for each unique part time contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m not entirely sure if we should consider flexibility in part time hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we ended up with just one calendar for part timers. That might apply here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
4 months ago
I think we might need multiple calendars for part time workers if their contracts differ significantly. It’s a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how part time workers can vary in hours, but if they all average 20 hours, maybe we only need one calendar for them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
5 months ago
I'm not sure about the "generic flexible work calendar" option. If part-time workers can work any number of hours, do we really need that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. We need one full-time work calendar, and then one part-time work calendar since management has agreed to estimate part-time workers at 20 hours per week. No need for any additional calendars.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. Does the part-time work calendar need to account for different part-time contract hours, or can we just assume 20 hours per week for all part-time workers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - we just need to create one full-time work calendar and one part-time work calendar, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
10 months ago
As an HR professional, I have to say that option A is the most accurate representation of the situation. Each part-time contract is unique, so we need a separate calendar for each one.
upvoted 0 times
Geraldine
8 months ago
Having separate calendars for each unique part-time contract will make scheduling much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
8 months ago
It would be too confusing to have just one part time work calendar for all the different contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
8 months ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense. Each part-time contract should have its own work calendar.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claudia
10 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I'm just hoping I don't end up with a 'work calendar' for my cat when I'm done. But seriously, I think B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Dawne
10 months ago
Yeah, having separate calendars for full time and part time workers makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
10 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
11 months ago
I'm going with C. Having a generic flexible work calendar in addition to the full-time and part-time calendars seems like a good way to handle the varying schedules of part-time resources.
upvoted 0 times
Isaac
9 months ago
Having separate calendars for full-time, part-time, and flexible workers makes sense for better resource planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
9 months ago
I would go with option C as well. It seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Agreed, having a generic flexible work calendar can help accommodate the varying schedules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
10 months ago
I think C is the best option. It covers all the different types of workers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgene
11 months ago
I think the answer is B. It makes the most sense to have one full-time work calendar and one part-time work calendar, since management has agreed on a standard 20-hour per week estimate for part-time workers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
11 months ago
I think we should also consider creating a generic flexible work calendar to accommodate any variations in work hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
11 months ago
I agree with Bev. It makes sense to have separate calendars for full time and part time resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
11 months ago
I think we should create one full time work calendar and one part time work calendar.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel