Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 8 Question 94 Discussion

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?#include #include #include using namespace std;templatestruct Out {ostream & out;Out(ostream & o): out(o){}void operator() (const T & val ) { out
D) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 8 7 9
B) 3 2 4 1 5 6 7 8 9 10
C) 3 2 4 1 5 6 10 8 7 9
E) compilation error

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 8 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPP exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 8
[All CPP Questions]

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t1[]={3,2,4,1,5};

int t2[]={6,10,8,7,9};

vector v1(10);

sort(t1, t1+5);

sort(t2, t2+5);

merge(t1,t1+5,t2,t2+5,v1.begin());

for_each(v1.begin(), v1.end(), Out(cout));cout<

return 0;

}

Program outputs:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lacey at Sep 18, 2024, 07:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carman
10 months ago
Nope, it's D for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
10 months ago
I think it should be E, there's a compilation error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
11 months ago
Wait, why does it say 10 before 8? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
11 months ago
Definitely outputs D, it's sorted!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
The code sorts and merges two arrays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
11 months ago
I have a feeling there might be a compilation error because of the way the merge function is used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe the output should be sorted, so maybe option D is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the merge function needing the output vector to be large enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
12 months ago
I think the code should compile fine since all the included libraries are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. There are a lot of moving parts with the arrays, vector, and custom struct. I'll need to walk through it carefully step-by-step to make sure I understand what's happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
12 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The merge function should combine the two sorted arrays into the vector in the correct order. I'll double-check the syntax, but I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the custom Out struct. Does that have something to do with the output? I'll need to research that a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
12 months ago
This looks like a tricky one! I'll need to carefully step through the code to understand what's happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
1 year ago
Okay, let's see... The code is sorting two arrays, then merging them into a vector. I think the key is understanding how the merge function works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
This question is similar to one we practiced, and I feel like the failover system mechanism was mentioned in that context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
1 year ago
Wait, what? Reverse order? Did the code accidentally summon a black hole that's sucking in the numbers? C is my choice, but I might need to consult a physicist before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
1 year ago
Compile error? Really? This code looks pretty straightforward. Clearly, the compiler must be on vacation today. E is just a wild guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The merge seems right, but the output looks a bit off. Maybe I should double-check the algorithm. D seems plausible, but I'm not confident.
upvoted 0 times
Dylan
1 year ago
User2: Maybe we should run the code to see the actual output
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
User3: I agree with User1, A) seems more likely based on the code
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
1 year ago
User2: I'm not so sure, I feel like it might be B) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 year ago
User1: I think the output will be A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
1 year ago
Ha! Looks like someone's trying to trick us. The merge is done correctly, but the output is in reverse order. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
India
1 year ago
Definitely C, the output is 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
1 year ago
Yeah, the merge is done correctly but the output is reversed.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gabriele
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the merge function is working correctly, but the array indices might be off. Let me double-check the logic. Maybe B is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
1 year ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanja
1 year ago
The code seems to be merging two sorted arrays into a vector. The output should be the merged and sorted elements, so I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
1 year ago
Looks like the code is merging and sorting the arrays correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Galen
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be E) compilation error because the code is missing the include for the merge function. Without it, the code won't compile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I agree with Valene. The code uses the sort function to sort the arrays and then merges them using the merge function. The output should be in ascending order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because the code sorts the arrays t1 and t2 and then merges them into vector v1 in ascending order.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel