What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
class B { int val;
public:
B(int v):val(v){}
int getV() const {return val;} bool operator < (const B & v) const { return val ostream & operator <<(ostream & out, const B & v) { out< template ostream & out; Out(ostream & o): out(o){} void operator() (const T & val ) { out< int main() { int t[]={8, 10, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 7, 9, 3}; vector v1(t, t+10); sort(v1.begin(), v1.end()); for_each(v1.begin(), v1.end(), Out(cout));cout< return 0; } Program outputs:
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CPP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
FR
Franchesca
11 months ago
Wait, how does it sort when the vector is initialized with integers?
MA
Man
11 months ago
Totally agree, it sorts the vector correctly!
GE
Georgiann
12 months ago
I think it might throw a compilation error.
GL
Glendora
12 months ago
It should output 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10.
TU
Tuyet
12 months ago
The code compiles fine.
CO
Coral
1 year ago
I believe the sorting should arrange the values in ascending order, so I think option B is correct, but I hope I’m not missing something about the vector.
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the vector initialization with the array. I feel like it might cause a compilation error, but I can't recall the specifics.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to sort a custom class, and it worked as expected. So, I'm leaning towards option B for the output.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
I think the code should compile fine since all the necessary operators and constructors are defined, but I'm not completely sure about the vector initialization.
JO
Joye
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Embedding them directly in the code seems like a bad idea, but I'm not sure if a hidden file is really that much more secure. Maybe I should consider changing them periodically instead?
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward PROC PRINT question. I think I've got this one figured out.
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The details in option A seem to match the description of Unified Data Management the best.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
I remember we debated if this statement oversimplifies both communism and radical Islam. Maybe it's misleading to equate them?
SE
Selma
1 year ago
Ah, I see what they're doing here. The sort function should work just fine, and the output should be the sorted vector of B objects. Yep, B is the correct answer for sure.
LE
Leonard
1 year ago
Haha, I can already see the problem. They forgot to overload the << operator for the B class. Gotta love those pesky compilation errors!
RI
Ricarda
1 year ago
User3
TA
Tanesha
1 year ago
User2
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
Compilation errors can be tricky to debug sometimes.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
Definitely, overloading the << operator is crucial for custom classes.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
Yeah, that's a common mistake.
QU
Queen
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The code includes some custom operator overloading, so it might not be as straightforward as it seems. I'll go with option B, just to be safe.
JO
Jolanda
1 year ago
Hmm, the code looks like it's trying to sort a vector of custom objects. My guess is that it will compile and run, and the output will be a sorted list of the object values.
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
User 1
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
User 2
NI
Nilsa
1 year ago
User 1
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
Looks like the code is sorting a vector of custom objects.
AS
Ashlyn
1 year ago
The output will be a sorted list of object values.
SY
Sylvie
1 year ago
It will compile and run successfully.
GR
Gretchen
1 year ago
B) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
AA
Aaron
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is B) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because the for_each function is used to output the sorted vector elements.
KA
Kami
1 year ago
I agree with Yen, the code uses the sort function to sort the vector of objects in ascending order.
YE
Yen
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 because the code sorts the vector in ascending order.