Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPA-21-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

What is the meaning of the following declaration? (Choose two.)char **ptr;
A) ptr is a pointer to a pointer to char and B) ptr is a pointer to char*
C) ptr is a pointer to a pointer to a pointer to char
D) ptr is a pointer to char

C++ Institute CPA-21-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPA-21-02 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-21-02 Questions]

What is the meaning of the following declaration? (Choose two.)

char **ptr;

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Franklyn at Dec 08, 2023, 03:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPA-21-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tomoko
9 months ago
I thought it was more complicated than that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
9 months ago
No way, it's just a pointer to char!
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
10 months ago
Wait, isn't it also a pointer to a pointer to a pointer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
I agree, it's not a pointer to char* though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
10 months ago
ptr is definitely a pointer to a pointer to char.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
10 months ago
I thought C was a possibility too, but I don't recall seeing a triple pointer in our examples. A seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify pointer types, and I think A and D are the most likely answers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B could be misleading since it says "pointer to char*" instead of "pointer to pointer."
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
11 months ago
I remember that a double pointer means it's pointing to another pointer, so I think A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
11 months ago
Pointers can be confusing, but I'll try to break this down step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
11 months ago
I've seen this type of declaration before. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
11 months ago
Whoa, pointers to pointers? This is getting a bit complex. I'll have to review my notes on pointer syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. Let me double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
11 months ago
Okay, so I need to add a new write-off reason and set it as the default. That makes sense, I should be able to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option C. I feel like an event management program can take on the subscriber role, but isn't it usually just the direct consumers that subscribe?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I need to set the verification mode and password for the host account, and then log in as the ldapuser40 user. And I have to download a certificate from a specific URL. Seems doable, but I'll want to double-check my work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options here. Should the project manager inform the sponsor that there can't be any changes to the scope, or should they involve the legal department in the negotiation? I'm not sure which one is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel