Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Broadcom 250-586 Exam - Topic 4 Question 33 Discussion

An organization has several remote locations with minimum bandwidth and would like to use a content distribution method that does NOT involve configuring an internal LiveUpdate server. What content distribution method should be utilized?
D) Group Update Provider
A) External LiveUpdate
B) Management Server
C) Intelligent Updater

Broadcom 250-586 Exam - Topic 4 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-586 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 4
[All 250-586 Questions]

An organization has several remote locations with minimum bandwidth and would like to use a content distribution method that does NOT involve configuring an internal LiveUpdate server. What content distribution method should be utilized?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

For an organization with remote locations and minimal bandwidth that wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using a Group Update Provider (GUP) is the best choice.

Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.

No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (External LiveUpdate) would involve each client connecting to Symantec's servers, which could strain bandwidth.

Option B (Management Server) directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.

Option C (Intelligent Updater) is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.

Thus, the Group Update Provider is the optimal solution for remote locations with limited bandwidth that do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
I think External LiveUpdate is the best choice. Easy to set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
5 days ago
Wait, can we really use that without an internal server? Sounds sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
10 days ago
Definitely External LiveUpdate, it’s the simplest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
15 days ago
Intelligent Updater sounds interesting, but is it reliable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
21 days ago
I disagree, Group Update Provider might be better for low bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
26 days ago
I think External LiveUpdate is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
1 month ago
I feel like B) Management Server is not the right choice here, but I can't recall why. It just seems too complex for low bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
1 month ago
I'm leaning towards D) Group Update Provider because it seems like a good way to manage updates without needing a server, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 month ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think A) External LiveUpdate could work, but it might still require some setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
2 months ago
I think the answer might be C) Intelligent Updater, but I'm not entirely sure if it fits the bandwidth issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel