Blue Prism ARA02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blue Prism's ARA02 exam

Question #: 26
Topic #: 1

Which of the following statements most accurately describes the design of the ROM?

AThe ROM has been designed to integrate fully with an organization's existing change management systems thereby removing the need for additional procedural and governance obligations.

BThe ROM has been designed to ensure automated processes can be delivered in the quickest way possible without any governance or standards and can be deployed into an environment that has no operational constraints

CThe ROM has been designed to ensure additional methodologies governances and a newly created organizational structures are in place to replace any current IT Project methodologies

DNone of the above

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, C

According to the result from [The Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site], some of the statements that are responsibilities of the RPA Governance Board are acting as the ultimate gate keeper for all demand generated via the pipeline, promoting the benefits of RPA throughout the organization, and accountability for benefits realization tracking. The RPA Governance Board is responsible for setting the strategy for RPA and delivering against that strategy. It also oversees the demand management, benefits realization, program steering, and continuous improvement of RPA initiatives. The other statement given is not a responsibility of the RPA Governance Board, but rather a responsibility of Process SMEs. Reference: [The Governance Board - Blue Prism Community Site]

by Pilar at Jul 05, 2024, 08:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARA02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alecia

4 months ago

C seems too complicated for a simple ROM design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

4 months ago

Wait, how can we just ignore operational constraints?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alva

4 months ago

B sounds risky, no governance at all?

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

4 months ago

Totally agree, A aligns with best practices!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnna

5 months ago

I think option A makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonie

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards option D because none of the statements seem to fully capture what we discussed in class about ROM integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about option B. It seems to suggest no governance at all, which doesn’t align with what we learned about best practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

5 months ago

I remember practicing a question about governance in ROM design, and I feel like option C might be the right approach since it mentions new structures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

5 months ago

I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it really removes all governance obligations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blythe

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B seems to be the opposite of what a well-designed ROM should do. I'll need to double-check my knowledge here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fatima

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording in these options. I'll need to make sure I fully understand the differences between them before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the design of the ROM, so I'll need to focus on the specific details in the answer choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the key design principles of a ROM.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

6 months ago

Based on my understanding of ROMs, I think option A sounds the most accurate. The key is integrating with existing change management systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

6 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different deployment options for ElasticSearch to figure out which one is not supported.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chana

6 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully review the steps in the IFRS development process and eliminate the one that doesn't fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christa

10 months ago

Wow, option B is really out there. Automated processes with no governance or standards? That's like building a house without a foundation. Not gonna end well.

upvoted 0 times

Bette

9 months ago

I think option A is the best choice, integrating with existing change management systems is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vannessa

9 months ago

Definitely, without proper governance, things can quickly spiral out of control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

10 months ago

Yeah, it's important to have governance and standards in place for any automated processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimi

10 months ago

I agree, option B sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marleen

10 months ago

Haha, option B sounds like the kind of 'solution' that would get an IT manager fired! 'Quickest way possible' and 'no operational constraints' - yeah, right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

10 months ago

Option C is definitely not the right answer. I don't think we want to replace existing IT project methodologies with a whole new organizational structure. That would be overkill.

upvoted 0 times

Arthur

9 months ago

Option C is definitely not the right answer. I don't think we want to replace existing IT project methodologies with a whole new organizational structure. That would be overkill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

9 months ago

B) The ROM has been designed to ensure automated processes can be delivered in the quickest way possible without any governance or standards and can be deployed into an environment that has no operational constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

9 months ago

A) The ROM has been designed to integrate fully with an organization's existing change management systems thereby removing the need for additional procedural and governance obligations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gennie

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by option B. Automating processes without any governance or standards? That sounds like a recipe for disaster!

upvoted 0 times

Christiane

9 months ago

Emily: Yeah, option A seems like the most practical and efficient design for the ROM.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

9 months ago

User 3: I think option A is the best choice, integrating with existing systems seems like a safer approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emily

10 months ago

User 2: Definitely, it's important to have governance and standards in place for automation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deandrea

11 months ago

User 1: I agree, option B does sound risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

11 months ago

Option D seems to be the correct answer here. The ROM is designed to provide a standardized and governed approach, not to remove governance or standards.

upvoted 0 times