Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Blockchain CBDE Exam - Topic 1 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Blockchain's CBDE exam

Question #: 107
Topic #: 1

[All CBDE Questions]

EVM assembly:

Ais much better than Solidity and a viable alternative.

Bcan be split across multiple files, but every contract must be in a file with the same name as the contract itself.

Cis another language similar to LLL, more secure than Solidity.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Martina at Jan 28, 2025, 01:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jeannetta

9 months ago

I heard EVM assembly is harder to learn than Solidity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

10 months ago

Yeah, every contract needs its own file name, that's a must.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barabara

10 months ago

Wait, is it really more secure than Solidity? That sounds surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonzo

10 months ago

I don't think it's better than Solidity, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cletus

10 months ago

EVM assembly is definitely more low-level than Solidity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

10 months ago

I’m pretty sure every contract needs to be in a file named after it, but I can't remember if that applies to EVM assembly too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

11 months ago

I vaguely remember that EVM assembly is more secure than Solidity, but I thought it was more about the control it gives developers rather than being a separate language like LLL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

11 months ago

I think I saw a practice question about file naming conventions in Solidity, and I feel like this option about EVM assembly might be similar, but I can't recall the details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

11 months ago

I remember discussing how EVM assembly is lower-level than Solidity, but I'm not sure if it's actually better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yasuko

11 months ago

EVM assembly, huh? I remember learning about that in class. I think it's a more low-level language than Solidity, which means it's closer to the actual Ethereum Virtual Machine. That could make it more secure, but also more complex to work with. I'll need to carefully consider the options here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

11 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the capabilities of EVM assembly, like whether it can be split across multiple files and if it's more secure than Solidity. I'll need to review my notes on the differences between these languages to answer this properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details here. I know EVM assembly is a way to write smart contracts directly in the Ethereum Virtual Machine's assembly language, but I'm not sure how it compares to Solidity in terms of viability or security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

11 months ago

I'm pretty confident about this one. EVM assembly is a lower-level language than Solidity, so it's likely more secure and efficient, but also more complex to work with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iesha

1 year ago

Ah, the joys of Ethereum programming. Where the language options are as countless as the bugs in my code.

upvoted 0 times

Lelia

1 year ago

C) is another language similar to LLL, more secure than Solidity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

1 year ago

B) can be split across multiple files, but every contract must be in a file with the same name as the contract itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lura

1 year ago

A) is much better than Solidity and a viable alternative.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Jarod

1 year ago

EVM assembly? More like 'Extremely Volatile Mess' if you ask me!

upvoted 0 times

Tammara

1 year ago

C) is another language similar to LLL, more secure than Solidity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carol

1 year ago

B) can be split across multiple files, but every contract must be in a file with the same name as the contract itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

1 year ago

A) is much better than Solidity and a viable alternative.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Tawna

1 year ago

EVM assembly, Solidity, LLL - it's like a crypto language alphabet soup! I just want to write some code and get it working.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barb

1 year ago

EVM assembly more secure than Solidity? That's a bold claim. I'll need to do some research before I believe that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mose

1 year ago

Splitting contracts across multiple files? That sounds like a recipe for a headache. I'll stick to the one-file-per-contract approach.

upvoted 0 times

Johnson

1 year ago

It's important to choose the approach that works best for you when it comes to EVM assembly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

1 year ago

Splitting contracts across multiple files can definitely lead to confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

1 year ago

I prefer the simplicity of having one file per contract as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudio

1 year ago

I agree, keeping each contract in its own file makes it easier to manage.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Edna

1 year ago

I'm not sure about EVM assembly being better than Solidity. They each have their own strengths and use cases.

upvoted 0 times

Janae

1 year ago

I think EVM assembly can be split across multiple files, but every contract must be in a file with the same name as the contract itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

1 year ago

EVM assembly is much better than Solidity and a viable alternative.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Goldie

1 year ago

I personally think EVM assembly is another language similar to LLL, more secure than Solidity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe EVM assembly can be split across multiple files, but every contract must be in a file with the same name as the contract itself.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edmond

1 year ago

I think EVM assembly is much better than Solidity and a viable alternative.

upvoted 0 times

...