Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 61 Discussion

An IT-related program has a critical team in a region experiencing a crisis. Due to uncertainty about the region's changing environment a company's senior leadership asks the program manager to decrease dependencies on the critical team that should the program manager do to mitigate the Impacts of this request?
D) Revisit the program management plan to clearly identify how decreasing critical team dependencies will impact component projects
A) Update the procurement management plan, and begin the request for proposal (RFP) process to replace the critical team by staff augmentation
B) Meet with the steering committee to request assistance and influence in obtaining additional resources
C) Level resources, and empower the critical team to complete its work before regional instability impacts its efforts

BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 5
[All RCDDv14.1 Questions]

An IT-related program has a critical team in a region experiencing a crisis. Due to uncertainty about the region's changing environment a company's senior leadership asks the program manager to decrease dependencies on the critical team that should the program manager do to mitigate the Impacts of this request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Beatriz at Aug 15, 2025, 03:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Brandon
9 months ago
Not sure if replacing the team is the best move. Too risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
Surprised they didn't consider B first. More resources could help!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
10 months ago
Totally agree with D! Can't just cut dependencies without a plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
10 months ago
C seems like a solid choice. Empowering the team could really help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense. Understanding impacts is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
11 months ago
Revisiting the program management plan sounds like a smart idea. It could help clarify the impacts of reducing dependencies, but I’m not sure how detailed that needs to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
11 months ago
I feel like empowering the critical team to finish their work is a solid approach, but what if the regional instability affects them before they can complete it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
11 months ago
I think meeting with the steering committee could be a good move. It might help to get more resources, but I wonder if that would actually solve the dependency issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of understanding dependencies in project management, but I'm not sure if updating the procurement plan is the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
11 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option A, since replacing the critical team through staff augmentation could be a good way to decrease dependencies. But I'd want to make sure that's feasible and won't cause other issues. Definitely going to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
12 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'd start by meeting with the steering committee to get their input and support, as suggested in option B. Then I'd look at revising the program management plan per option D to identify the impacts. That should give me a solid foundation to work from.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different approaches mentioned, and I'm not sure which one would be the most effective. I might need to re-read the question a few times to really understand the best way to mitigate the impacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is to focus on decreasing dependencies on the critical team. Option D looks like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
I agree, staff augmentation could help mitigate the impacts of decreasing dependencies on the critical team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 year ago
I think we should update the procurement management plan and start the RFP process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
I agree with Melissa. Option D provides a clear and strategic way to mitigate the impacts of the request. Transparency is crucial in a crisis situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
Option D seems the most comprehensive approach to address the issue. Revisiting the program management plan is key to understanding the impact of decreasing dependencies on the critical team.
upvoted 0 times
Giuseppe
1 year ago
Revisiting the program management plan is key to understanding the impact of decreasing dependencies on the critical team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
A) Update the procurement management plan, and begin the request for proposal (RFP) process to replace the critical team by staff augmentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
Option D seems the most comprehensive approach to address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel