Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

A program with objectives trial impact a large segment of the population receives negative commentary from organizations representing the public interest What action should the program manager take first?
A) Rework the stakeholder engagement plan to foster better relationships with the affected stakeholder groups
B) Review the stakeholder register to determine the ability of the affected stakeholder group(s) to affect program outcomes
C) Assess the risk of sustained negative media coverage
D) Discuss the issues with the governance board to determine next steps

BICSI RCDDv14.1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for BICSI's RCDDv14.1 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 2
[All RCDDv14.1 Questions]

A program with objectives trial impact a large segment of the population receives negative commentary from organizations representing the public interest What action should the program manager take first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Salome at Mar 22, 2025, 05:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium RCDDv14.1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ezekiel
6 months ago
Reviewing the stakeholder register first seems more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
6 months ago
Definitely agree, better relationships can help!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
6 months ago
Not sure if any of these options will actually fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
6 months ago
Wait, why would they need to assess media coverage before talking to stakeholders?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
6 months ago
I think reworking the stakeholder engagement plan is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
7 months ago
I wonder if discussing the issues with the governance board might be the best move. They could provide guidance on how to handle the backlash effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
7 months ago
Assessing the risk of negative media coverage sounds crucial too. I feel like that could really impact public perception and support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
7 months ago
I’m not so sure about that. I remember a practice question where reworking the stakeholder engagement plan was emphasized as a way to build trust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
7 months ago
I think the first step should be to review the stakeholder register. It’s important to understand who can really influence the program outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
8 months ago
I'd go with option D and discuss the issues with the governance board. They'll have the best insight into the program's strategic objectives and how to navigate this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
8 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is to address the negative commentary from the public interest groups. Reworking the stakeholder engagement plan seems like the most logical first step to improve those relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. There are a few options that seem reasonable, but I'm not sure which one is the best first step. Maybe I should read through the question again carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about stakeholder management. I'd start by reviewing the stakeholder register to understand the affected groups and their influence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 year ago
That's a good point, it's important to consider all potential consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
1 year ago
All this stakeholder mumbo-jumbo is making my head spin. Maybe they should just bribe the naysayers and call it a day. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Eliz
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe reworking the stakeholder engagement plan would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
1 year ago
User 1: I don't think bribing is the solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicitas
1 year ago
I'm going with C. Negative media coverage can really tank a program, so I'd want to get ahead of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 year ago
But shouldn't they also assess the risk of negative media coverage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
I agree with Lawrence, building better relationships with stakeholders is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. Bring in the big guns and get the governance board involved. They'll know how to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
Sharen
1 year ago
Let's schedule a meeting with the governance board as soon as possible to address this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
1 year ago
We should definitely discuss the issues with the governance board before taking any further action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 year ago
I agree, the governance board can provide valuable insights on how to address the negative commentary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. Bring in the big guns and get the governance board involved. They'll know how to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nakita
1 year ago
I agree, B is the way to go. Gotta assess the impact before making any moves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 year ago
I think the program manager should rework the stakeholder engagement plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
Option B seems the most logical first step. Understanding the stakeholder groups and their influence is crucial before taking any action.
upvoted 0 times
Carissa
1 year ago
C: Let's see how they can affect program outcomes before making any decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
B: Yeah, understanding their influence is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
A: I think we should review the stakeholder register first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel