Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 9 Question 67 Discussion

Which of the following statements represents the most effective contribution of the stakeholders to the completion of the failure mode analysis table?Number of correct responses: 1
C) The system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
D) The aircraft pilot is the only one qualified to contribute to assess the priority and thus should be assigned this task. The customer representative should contribute to assess the detection.

BCS TM12 Exam - Topic 9 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 9
[All TM12 Questions]

Which of the following statements represents the most effective contribution of the stakeholders to the completion of the failure mode analysis table?

Number of correct responses: 1

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lauran at Mar 21, 2023, 03:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM12 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Emogene
9 months ago
I’m surprised D is even an option, that’s too limiting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
9 months ago
Definitely agree with A, seems balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
9 months ago
Wait, can one person really assess priority alone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
9 months ago
I think B is the better choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
9 months ago
A and B both sound reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m a bit confused about whether the pilot should really assess priority or if that’s more for the engineers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
10 months ago
I feel like the expert tester should definitely be involved in assessing detection, but I can't recall if they should be the only one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
10 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar from our practice questions, where we emphasized the roles of the pilot and customer representative in detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how different stakeholders have unique insights, but I'm not sure if the pilot should assess priority or detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
10 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the security requirements. Since the field is secured, we'll need to make sure our solution respects those permissions and doesn't try to bypass them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully review the configuration commands and the exhibit to figure out what's missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
10 months ago
I remember we did similar problems in class, and I think it had something to do with using the binomial distribution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 year ago
Option C? Seriously? Letting the system architect and chief software engineer handle the detection? That's like asking a fish to climb a tree.
upvoted 0 times
Pearlene
1 year ago
Option C does seem a bit off. The system architect and chief software engineer might not be the best fit for assessing detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
1 year ago
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
I'm going with option A. It makes the most sense to have the technical folks handle the priority assessment and the end-users handle the detection. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
Option D? Really? Putting all the priority assessment on the pilot is a recipe for disaster. That's not how failure mode analysis works.
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
1 year ago
C) The system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
1 year ago
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
1 year ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
1 year ago
I think option A is the way to go. Getting input from the right people on the right aspects is key to an effective failure mode analysis.
upvoted 0 times
Latricia
1 year ago
Definitely, having a clear division of tasks among stakeholders is crucial for an effective failure mode analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 year ago
Yes, I see your point. It's important to have the right stakeholders focusing on the right aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
1 year ago
But don't you think the system architect and chief software engineer should focus on priority instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
1 year ago
I agree, having the aircraft pilot and customer representative assess detection makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
1 year ago
True, it's important to have the right stakeholders contributing to different aspects of the analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 year ago
I see your point, but having the expert tester assess detection could also be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
But don't you think the system architect and chief software engineer should assess priority instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
1 year ago
I agree, having the aircraft pilot and customer representative assess detection makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anglea
1 year ago
The question is clear, and the options provide a good mix of stakeholder involvement. This will be a tricky one to solve.
upvoted 0 times
Fallon
1 year ago
I agree, the aircraft pilot and customer representative should assess detection, while the others assess priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
I think option A is the most effective contribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leatha
1 year ago
But the priority should be assessed by the system architect and chief software engineer according to option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better because the pilot and customer should focus on priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
I think option A is the most effective contribution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel