Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS Exam TM12 Topic 7 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TM12 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 7
[All TM12 Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications.

You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an open-source tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

Number of correct responses: 3

(2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Melvin
23 days ago
RAM requirements? Seriously? I bet the developers spent more time debating emojis in the commit messages than optimizing memory usage. This is avionics, not Candy Crush.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 months ago
I'm curious about the licensing scheme and whether it aligns with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company. That could be a potential landmine.
upvoted 0 times
Glen
9 days ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
15 days ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
16 days ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
1 months ago
Usability is also important, but the real challenge is the cost and effort to qualify the tool as a verification tool under DO-178B. That's going to be a major hurdle.
upvoted 0 times
Abel
7 days ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
8 days ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
17 days ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
26 days ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
28 days ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
1 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
The key concern here is whether the open-source tool can meet the coverage requirements for all three CSCI levels - A, B, and C. That's critical for compliance with DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
20 days ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hollis
2 months ago
I believe another concern is the cost to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
2 months ago
I agree with Lai. It's crucial for the tool to cover all levels A, B, and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 months ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel