MENU
Assume you are managing a test automation project for a mission-critical system.
Because vendor provided tools and open source solutions don't meet the needs of this project, you ask your test team to develop a custom automation framework.
Which of the following management issues associated to the development of this custom automation framework is least likely to manage?
Number of correct responses: 1
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium TM12 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
LE
Lettie
11 months ago
Wait, are we really going to communicate changes to all users? Sounds complicated.
JU
Juliana
11 months ago
Maintenance is a must, can't skip that!
TA
Taryn
12 months ago
Not sure about the GNU license part, seems a bit overkill.
RO
Rossana
12 months ago
I think documentation is super important too.
FL
Flo
1 year ago
Definitely need proper testing for the framework!
DA
Dan
1 year ago
Proper testing seems like a given for any framework, but I wonder if maintenance might be overlooked sometimes in practice.
KI
Kimberely
1 year ago
I feel like communicating changes under the GNU license is important, but I can't recall if it’s something we would manage less compared to testing or documentation.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
I think we practiced a question about maintenance being crucial for any custom tool, so maybe that's not the right answer.
CR
Cruz
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of documentation in our last class, but I'm not sure if it's the least likely issue to manage here.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of managing a custom automation framework. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option carefully.
MA
Makeda
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to identify the management issue that is least likely to be a challenge. I'll go through the options systematically.
CA
Caitlin
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the details of the question again to make sure I understand the context.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think through the management issues involved.
LU
Lucille
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The changes to the custom automation framework under the GNU license seem like the least likely management issue to me.
TA
Tatum
1 year ago
Alright, let me think this through step-by-step. Defining basic API information and request parameters are definitely required. Attaching a domain name is optional, so I'll go with that as the non-mandatory step.
ME
Melissa
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be configuring the run environment to include the necessary packages for the model training script. I think I have a good handle on how to do that, so I'll give it a try.
LE
Lea
1 year ago
I think IMAP is definitely one of them. I'm just not sure about the second option.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
Proper maintenance? Nah, we'll just let it gather dust until it inevitably breaks down. That's the real trick to managing this project!
BR
Brandon
1 year ago
C) The changes to the custom automation framework should be communicated to all external users of this tool under the GNU license
LE
Leonida
1 year ago
B) The custom automation framework will require an adequate documentation
GE
Gerry
1 year ago
A) Proper testing for the custom automation framework must be performed
SU
Sunny
2 years ago
Communicating changes to external users under the GNU license? That's just a fancy way of saying we can do whatever we want, right?
LE
Lezlie
1 year ago
C) The changes to the custom automation framework should be communicated to all external users of this tool under the GNU license
DO
Donte
1 year ago
D) The custom automation framework will need proper maintenance
TE
Telma
1 year ago
C) The changes to the custom automation framework should be communicated to all external users of this tool under the GNU license
BA
Barney
1 year ago
B) The custom automation framework will require an adequate documentation
MA
Mary
1 year ago
A) Proper testing for the custom automation framework must be performed
CA
Carlee
1 year ago
B) The custom automation framework will require an adequate documentation
RO
Rosita
1 year ago
A) Proper testing for the custom automation framework must be performed
MA
Maryann
2 years ago
Documentation? Ain't nobody got time for that! Let's just hope the future maintainers can figure it out on their own.
YV
Yvonne
2 years ago
I believe the changes to the custom automation framework should be communicated to all external users of this tool under the GNU license. It's important for transparency and compliance.
MA
Mayra
2 years ago
Proper testing for the custom automation framework? Pfft, who needs that when we can just wing it and see what happens!
DO
Domitila
2 years ago
D) The custom automation framework will need proper maintenance
MA
Malinda
2 years ago
B) The custom automation framework will require an adequate documentation
AL
Alfreda
2 years ago
A) Proper testing for the custom automation framework must be performed
WI
Willodean
2 years ago
I agree with Leota. Without proper testing, the custom automation framework may not work as expected.
LE
Leota
2 years ago
I think proper testing for the custom automation framework must be performed.