Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BCS TAE Exam - Topic 8 Question 5 Discussion

You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach for automatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardware and communication links that can be unreliable.Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?
C) Looking for tools that allow performing setup and teardown of the test suites and the SUT.
A) Looking for tools that allows direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events.
B) Adopting a test definition strategy based on classification tree coverage for the test definition layer.
D) Adopting a test definition strategy based on use case/exception case coverage for the definition layer.

BCS TAE Exam - Topic 8 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for BCS's TAE exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 8
[All TAE Questions]

You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach for automatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardware and communication links that can be unreliable.

Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Levi at May 25, 2022, 04:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Billy
10 months ago
I prefer D, use case coverage feels more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
10 months ago
B seems solid, classification tree coverage is a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
10 months ago
Not sure about A, what if the tools aren't reliable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
10 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it’s all about managing events!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
10 months ago
I think option A is crucial for handling exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
I recall that use case coverage is essential for ensuring we test all scenarios, especially with exceptions. Option D could be the right choice, but I need to think more about the context of the SUT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
11 months ago
I feel like setup and teardown are crucial for any test environment, especially with unreliable hardware. So, option C might be important, but I'm not convinced it's the top priority here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
11 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we focused on test definitions. Option B sounds familiar, but I wonder if it really applies to event-driven systems like this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of handling exceptions in state-based systems, so option A seems relevant, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most critical aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
11 months ago
This seems like a classic EIGRP load-balancing problem. I'm pretty confident the solution is to adjust the EIGRP metrics on the relevant interfaces to achieve the desired load distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the specific router based on the information provided in the output. Let me go through the options one by one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel