MENU
Your goal is to verify completeness, consistency and correct behavior of an automated test suite. The TAS has been proven to successfully install in the SUT environment. All the preliminary checks to verify the correct functioning of the automated test environment and test tool configuration, installation and setup have successfully completed.
Which of the following is NOT a relevant check for achieving your goal in this scenario?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
VA
Van
11 months ago
B is crucial, post conditions matter for test validity!
LI
Lindy
11 months ago
Wait, are we really checking for repeatable loading? Sounds weird.
QU
Quentin
11 months ago
D is super important too, outcomes should be consistent!
KE
Kenneth
11 months ago
I think C is the odd one out here.
OC
Octavio
11 months ago
A is definitely relevant, you need expected results.
TA
Tamra
12 months ago
I feel like checking for repeatable outcomes is essential, but I wonder if that makes option C the odd one out here.
RI
Rikki
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option C. I thought repeatability of the TAS loading was crucial, but maybe it’s not directly related to the test case outcomes?
BE
Bea
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed post conditions, so I feel like option B might be relevant.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
I think checking the expected results is important, but I'm not sure if it's necessary for verifying completeness.
MA
Ma
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "not a relevant check"? Are they looking for the one that's least important, or the one that's completely irrelevant? I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.
KA
Kathryn
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Checking whether the test cases produce repeatable outcomes is definitely the most relevant check here, since that's key to verifying the consistency and correct behavior of the test suite. The other options all seem like they would contribute to that goal.
NO
Novella
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "expected results" and "post conditions" are referring to, so I'll need to think through those options carefully. The repeatability of the test cases and TAS loading seem more directly relevant to the goal.
WI
Wilburn
1 year ago
This question is asking me to identify which check is not relevant for verifying the completeness, consistency, and correct behavior of the automated test suite. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about which one doesn't directly contribute to that goal.
JE
Jerrod
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording on some of these options. Creating a Milestone with the right entry criteria seems like a good approach, but I'm not sure how that would tie into the 48-hour SLA.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'm trying to think through the different hacking techniques mentioned, but I'm a bit confused on how they would specifically enable remote surveillance. I'll have to think about this one some more.
BE
Becky
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different stages of the audit process. I'll need to carefully read through each choice to determine which one is most likely to occur during the planning phase.
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the reimbursement part; it feels like it could create bad feelings. I think I'll skip option II.
AL
Alex
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Maybe we should just check if the test suite comes with a built-in comedy routine. That would really seal the deal!
DE
Denae
1 year ago
Repeatable outcomes? Doesn't that go without saying? I mean, what's the point of a test if it doesn't give you the same result every time?
JO
Josphine
1 year ago
Repeatability is key. If the TAS can't be loaded consistently, the whole thing falls apart. That's a must-check!
AU
Audra
1 year ago
D) Checking whether all the test cases produce repeatable outcomes
BE
Beata
1 year ago
C) Checking whether the loading of the TAS is repeatable in the SUT environment
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
B) Checking whether the post condition have been fulfilled for all the test cases
CE
Cecil
1 year ago
A) Checking whether all the test cases contain the expected results
KA
Katy
1 year ago
Checking the post-conditions? That's a no-brainer. Can't have any loose ends, right?
NY
Nydia
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, we can't afford any inconsistencies in the test results.
BI
Billye
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, we need to make sure all conditions are met for accurate testing.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
User 1: Checking the post-conditions is crucial for ensuring the correctness of the test cases.
AN
Anthony
1 year ago
But if the TAS loading is not repeatable, how can we verify the correct behavior of the automated test suite?
CA
Cassi
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is NOT relevant.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Hmm, I think checking the expected results is definitely relevant. Gotta make sure the test cases are doing what they're supposed to!
DO
Doretha
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, we need to ensure that the test cases are producing the expected outcomes consistently.
EL
Elbert
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, checking the expected results is crucial for verifying the correctness of the test cases.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that's a crucial check to make sure the automated test suite is functioning as expected.
MA
Mable
1 year ago
User 1: Checking the expected results is definitely important. We need to ensure the test cases are working correctly.
AN
Anthony
1 year ago
I think option A is NOT a relevant check.
GL
Gladys
2 years ago
I disagree. Option C is NOT relevant because we already know the TAS can be loaded in the SUT environment.
MA
Marcelle
2 years ago
I agree with Tandra. Checking expected results is important for completeness.
TA
Tandra
2 years ago
I think option A is NOT a relevant check.