Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

BCS PDP9 Exam - Topic 6 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Loreta on Jun 29, 2024 at 09:28 PM

Which of the following is NOT a key requirement of independent supervisory authorities?

Suggested Answer: A

The definitions of ''public authority'' and ''public body'' for the purposes of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 are found in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 respectively. Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 2018 provides that a public authority or a public body is one that is listed in Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or is designated by an order under section 5 of that Act. However, a court or tribunal acting in its judicial capacity is not considered a public authority or a public body under the Data Protection Act 2018.Reference:

Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 20181

Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000


Get Premium PDP9 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
52 comments · newest first
NA
Natalie 11 months ago
Not convinced about A. Seems like a weird rule to have.
JO
Jodi 11 months ago
B and C are definitely key requirements!
DA
Dahlia 11 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? I thought leadership terms were common.
FR
Frank 12 months ago
Totally agree, A seems off.
DO
Dominic 12 months ago
I think A is the right answer. Leadership changes aren't a must.
GW
Gwenn 12 months ago
Mutual assistance sounds important too, but I feel like the leadership term could be a requirement that doesn't fit.
RE
Rebeca 1 year ago
Reviewing DPIAs seems like a key function, but I can't recall if it's specifically for unmitigated high risk.
YO
Yolande 1 year ago
I remember something about independence being crucial for supervisory authorities, so that might not be the answer.
NI
Nickole 1 year ago
I think the leadership changing every four years might be the odd one out, but I'm not completely sure.
DO
Dorsey 1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. I know the authorities need to be independent, but I can't recall the other specific requirements off the top of my head. I'll have to review my notes to make sure I get this right.
TA
Tabetha 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I remember from the course materials that independent supervisory authorities must operate independently and provide each other with mutual assistance. I don't think the leadership changing every four years is a key requirement, so I'll go with A.
JE
Jenise 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know independent supervisory authorities need to operate independently, but I'm not sure about the other requirements. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LI
Lizette 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is A since the leadership changing every four years doesn't seem like a key requirement for independent supervisory authorities.
TA
Taryn 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review the integration settings again to be sure.
EM
Emily 1 year ago
Alright, I've got an idea. If the 'Automatic submission' option is selected in Firefox, that could be causing issues with the Okta plugin. I'll make sure to check that setting and see if it resolves the problem.
LA
Latricia 1 year ago
Ah, I see. The question is asking about the role of access points, not just their basic function. I think I have a good understanding of how access points fit into the overall enterprise network, so I should be able to figure this out.
CE
Ceola 1 year ago
I can't beliCeola they're Ceolan asking this. Independence is the whole point of these authorities!
ZO
Zona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ceola
D) They must provide each other with mutual assistance
NA
Nada 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ceola
C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
PA
Pamella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ceola
B) They must operate independently.
DA
Dallas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ceola
A) Their leadership must change every four years
DY
Dylan 1 year ago
Mutual assistance? That's like asking the referees to help each other during a game. Absurd!
ER
Eric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
CE
Celeste 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
KI
Kimberlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
B) They must operate independently.
AR
Aretha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
A) Their leadership must change every four years
BR
Brittni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
B) They must operate independently.
KA
Karma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dylan
A) Their leadership must change every four years
DA
Daryl 1 year ago
C seems like a logical requirement. Gotta keep those DPIAs in check, right?
AD
Adell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daryl
C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daryl
B) They must operate independently.
TH
Thea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daryl
A) Their leadership must change every four years
BR
Brett 2 years ago
Clearly, B is the correct answer. How else can they be 'independent' if they're not, you know, independent?
JU
Julian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brett
User 4: D) They must provide each other with mutual assistance
SH
Shaun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brett
User 3: C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brett
User 2: A) Their leadership must change every four years
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brett
User 1: B) They must operate independently.
TO
Tonette 2 years ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess we need to review the requirements more carefully.
NA
Na 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk.
TO
Tonette 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Their leadership must change every four years.
PH
Phyliss 2 years ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess we need to review the requirements more carefully.
BR
Brinda 2 years ago
A changing leadership every four years? That's a recipe for chaos, not independence!
CH
Charlesetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
That's true, it helps ensure continuity and effectiveness.
WI
Wilson 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
It's important for supervisory authorities to be consistent in their leadership.
ME
Melita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
Definitely, independence requires stability in leadership.
JO
Joesph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
I agree, having a changing leadership every four years doesn't sound like a good idea.
CH
Chun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
D) They must provide each other with mutual assistance
BI
Billy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk
FR
Frank 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
B) They must operate independently.
CA
Candra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
A) Their leadership must change every four years
MI
Mila 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) They review DPIAs in cases of unmitigated high risk.
PH
Phyliss 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Their leadership must change every four years.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel