You know what they say, 'the only constant is change.' Looks like this business is in for a wild ride. I just hope they don't forget to pack their sense of humor for the journey!
I vote for option E: Bring in a team of monkeys, let them loose in the office, and see what they come up with. Guaranteed to be more creative than any human-made 'to be' model!
Option D, all the way! Why reinvent the wheel? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Let's keep the good stuff and build the 'to be' model around that. Efficiency, folks. Efficiency!
I'd go with option A. Understand the current state before diving into the future state. It's like cleaning your room before redecorating - you need to know what you're working with first. Plus, the problems in the 'as is' model could inform the 'to be' design. Just my two cents.
I'm torn between B and D. On one hand, improving the 'as is' model to accommodate the 'to be' could be efficient. But identifying the effective parts of the current process and incorporating them into the future model also makes a lot of sense. Hmm, tough choice.
Option C seems like the best approach to me. Why waste time on a detailed 'as is' model when the future needs are so different? Let's just focus on the 'to be' and get this show on the road!
I agree. It's important to strike a balance between understanding the current state and focusing on the future goals. Maybe a brief 'as is' model could help us achieve that.
That's a good point. Maybe we can quickly outline the key components of the current operations to ensure we don't miss anything crucial in the 'to be' model.
But what if there are important aspects of the current operations that we need to carry over to the future model? Maybe developing an 'as is' model could help us identify those.
Option C seems like the best approach to me. Why waste time on a detailed 'as is' model when the future needs are so different? Let's just focus on the 'to be' and get this show on the road!
I think it's important to develop an 'as is' model first to understand the current problems before moving on to the 'to be' model. Option A seems like the right way to go.
Option C seems like the best approach to me. Why waste time on a detailed 'as is' model when the future needs are so different? Let's just focus on the 'to be' and get this show on the road!
Shaun
28 days agoElouise
1 months agoRoyal
1 months agoKris
1 months agoDesmond
18 days agoMozelle
1 months agoQuiana
4 days agoArlette
8 days agoLettie
2 months agoLawana
Annamaria
5 days agoDelisa
8 days agoAnabel
12 days agoBuck
2 months agoTitus
2 months agoDominga
2 months agoAlecia
3 months agoCarmen
3 months ago