In a matrix organizational form, which factor(s) make it difficult for a project manager to provide a valid input into the employee's performance review?
E is the way to go here. Trying to evaluate people you barely interact with on technical skills you don't possess? That's like asking a plumber to review the work of a rocket scientist. Good luck with that!
Yeah, and when employees spend only a short amount of time on the project, it makes it even harder for the project manager to evaluate their performance.
C and D seem like the obvious choices, but E covers all the bases. Lack of direct supervision and technical knowledge to assess the employees - that's a recipe for disaster in a matrix structure.
I think the answer is E. Not working directly with the functional employees and their short project assignments make it super challenging to give a meaningful performance review. It's like trying to judge a fish's ability to climb a tree.
Wow, this question really hits the nail on the head. In a matrix organization, it's like trying to herd cats and evaluate their performance - not a job for the faint of heart!
Noble
1 months agoWilletta
8 days agoClorinda
17 days agoJesusita
1 months agoJose
2 months agoCarrol
2 months agoCassi
2 months agoWilburn
1 months agoErasmo
1 months agoRyan
2 months agoDevon
2 months agoEve
28 days agoJill
1 months agoCarlee
1 months agoKrissy
2 months ago