Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

BACB Exam BCBA Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for BACB's BCBA exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 1
[All BCBA Questions]

What is the next step in the assessment process if data from the functional analysis do NOT support the original hypothesis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Sharee at May 30, 2023, 08:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium BCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marisha
27 days ago
Well, if the data doesn't support the original hypothesis, I guess we could just close our eyes, cross our fingers, and hope the next assessment magically aligns with what we want to see. Or we could, you know, use that brain thing and go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
1 months ago
Personally, I'm leaning towards B. Why not just cover all our bases and design an intervention to address every possible function? After all, the behavior is the real problem, not the hypothesis.
upvoted 0 times
Myra
3 days ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to alter the hypothesis based on the results of the functional assessment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 days ago
I agree, covering all possible functions with a package intervention seems like a comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
9 days ago
That's true, it could save time and resources to adjust the hypothesis rather than designing a broad intervention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
13 days ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to alter the hypothesis based on the results of the functional assessment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
19 days ago
I agree, covering all possible functions with a package intervention seems like a comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jovita
1 months ago
Option C is a bit concerning, as continuing to conduct the assessment until the data matches the original hypothesis seems like a recipe for confirmation bias. Better to be open-minded and go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. While a comprehensive intervention package might work, it seems more prudent to adjust the hypothesis to align with the actual functional assessment findings.
upvoted 0 times
Kent
1 days ago
I think it's better to design a package intervention to cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Misty
2 months ago
Option D is clearly the correct answer. If the functional assessment data doesn't support the original hypothesis, it's time to revise the hypothesis based on the new information gathered.
upvoted 0 times
Kimi
13 days ago
Yes, it's crucial to make sure the hypothesis aligns with the results of the functional assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
16 days ago
I agree, it's important to alter the hypothesis based on the new data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catrice
2 months ago
But what if the data still doesn't support the new hypothesis? Should we keep adjusting it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
I agree, it's important to adjust the hypothesis to better understand the behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
2 months ago
I think the next step would be to alter the hypothesis based on the results of the functional assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe we should design a package intervention to address all possible functions of the behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
2 months ago
I agree with you, My. It's important to adjust the hypothesis based on the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
2 months ago
I think if the data doesn't support the original hypothesis, we should alter the hypothesis.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel