Axis ANVE Exam - Topic 5 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Axis's ANVE exam

Question #: 98
Topic #: 5

[All ANVE Questions]

In good conditions, a pixel density of 250 px/m (80 px/ft) is required for

Arecognition.

Bidentification.

Cdetection.

Dobservation.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

In good conditions, a pixel density of 250 px/m (80 px/ft) is required for identification purposes. This means that at this resolution, the image quality is sufficient to identify individuals, objects, or other details accurately. Identification requires the highest level of detail among the common surveillance objectives (detection, observation, recognition, identification). This pixel density allows for clear and precise visual information necessary for identifying specific features such as facial characteristics or license plates.

by Beckie at Sep 14, 2024, 07:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ANVE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Deane

5 months ago

Totally agree, recognition is the key here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

5 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? Seems high!

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

5 months ago

250 px/m sounds right for detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Diane

5 months ago

I thought it was for identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

6 months ago

That's definitely for recognition!

upvoted 0 times

...

Audry

6 months ago

I vaguely recall that observation might need less detail, but I can't quite remember the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tony

6 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought detection required a lower pixel density than recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

6 months ago

This seems similar to a practice question we did on pixel density, and I feel like identification was the answer there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

6 months ago

I think I remember that 250 px/m is related to recognition, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

6 months ago

I feel confident about this one. The pixel density requirement and the options provided give me a good framework to work with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brunilda

6 months ago

I've got a strategy - I'll start by eliminating any options that don't seem to fit the context, then carefully compare the remaining ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenelle

6 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really analyze the differences between them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

6 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the required pixel density for a specific purpose, so I need to carefully consider each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

6 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll focus on the key details like the pixel density and the options provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desmond

7 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about how notable event urgency is calculated. I think I've got a good handle on this topic, so I'll carefully review the options and select the best answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

2 years ago

This is a no-brainer, it's clearly B) identification. Unless you're trying to read someone's mind through the screen, that is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

2 years ago

Gotta be C) detection. I don't need 250 px/m to recognize a picture of my cat, that's overkill!

upvoted 0 times

Ammie

1 year ago

I would go with C) detection as well, it seems like the best fit for the pixel density mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristian

1 year ago

Yeah, I think C) detection makes the most sense in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

1 year ago

I agree, C) detection seems like the most appropriate option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

2 years ago

I'm going with B) identification. Anything less and you'd be squinting at the screen trying to make out the details.

upvoted 0 times

Nakisha

1 year ago

I also think B) identification is the right choice for that pixel density.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

2 years ago

Yeah, I think B) identification makes the most sense for clear details on the screen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlee

2 years ago

I agree, B) identification is definitely the best option for that pixel density.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

2 years ago

But don't you think that in good conditions, a higher pixel density would be needed for identification rather than recognition?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

2 years ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

2 years ago

I think the answer is B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

2 years ago

Hmm, C) detection sounds right to me. That level of detail seems more for identifying specific objects than just general recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

2 years ago

D) observation, definitely. I mean, who needs that kind of pixel density to just detect something?

upvoted 0 times

Gilma

1 year ago

D) observation, definitely. I mean, who needs that kind of pixel density to just detect something?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

1 year ago

C) detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 year ago

B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

1 year ago

A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

2 years ago

C) detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanda

2 years ago

B) identification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

2 years ago

A) recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Germaine

2 years ago

I think it's B) identification. Seems like a pretty high pixel density for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

Laurel

2 years ago

I think D) observation makes sense too, as it would need a high pixel density for detailed viewing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

2 years ago

I would go with C) detection, as it requires a higher pixel density for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

2 years ago

I agree, it does seem high for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toshia

2 years ago

I think it's B) identification. Seems like a pretty high pixel density for just recognition.

upvoted 0 times

...