Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Avaya Exam 37820X Topic 1 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Avaya's 37820X exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 1
[All 37820X Questions]

Your customer wants an Avaya video conferencing solution that can integrate with IP Office. The requirement Is to be able to conduct a single video conferencing with up to five additional participants to Join remotely using smartphones or desktop PCs. They have two small board rooms they want to be able to join the video conference.

What would be the least costly solution that will meet their requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Staci at Jul 09, 2023, 10:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 37820X Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Daniel
12 days ago
Option C, because if you can't afford the fancy stuff, just throw some duct tape and paperclips at the problem and call it a day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
14 days ago
Option D seems a bit overkill for a small setup. The XT5000 endpoints might be like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
France
16 days ago
Option C looks like a cost-effective solution, but I'm worried about managing multiple SMB9 licenses. Maybe I should just go with the 'Swiss Army knife' approach and get the MCU9 license.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
17 days ago
The IX Collaboration Unit in option B seems like a solid choice to handle the remote participants. I wonder if it'll integrate seamlessly with the IP Office, though.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
2 days ago
Option B includes an IX Collaboration Unit CU360, which should work well for remote participants.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julieta
22 days ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure if the embedded server will have enough capacity for five remote participants. Hmm, gotta dig deeper into the specs.
upvoted 0 times
Serina
2 days ago
User 1: Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure if the embedded server will have enough capacity for five remote participants. Hmm, gotta dig deeper into the specs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharan
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D would be the best solution because it includes an XT5000 endpoint in each board room.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 months ago
I agree with Kimberlie, option C seems like the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 months ago
I think option C would be the least costly solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
But option C includes licenses for each board room, which seems necessary for their requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A would be more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
I think option C would be the least costly solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel