Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AutoDesk BIM_MGT_101 Exam - Topic 4 Question 3 Discussion

Posted by Major on Jul 19, 2026 at 04:22 PM

During a coordination meeting, project leads ask for a report showing only active clashes between mechanical systems and structural framing in patient-room zones, following the approved clash matrix.

What is the most effective way to provide this report using Model Coordination?

Suggested Answer: A

A custom coordination view should be created using the applicable published mechanical and structural models and limited to the patient-room zones required by the approved clash matrix. The clash results can then be filtered by model pair, location, object category, and active status before the filtered list is exported. This produces a targeted report containing only the coordination conditions requested by the project leads.

The custom-view approach maintains the relationship between the clash records and the coordinated model geometry. It also makes the review repeatable: the BIM manager can return to the saved view during subsequent coordination cycles and evaluate whether the same discipline and location criteria have been resolved.

Asking individual disciplines to prepare independent reports creates inconsistent evaluation criteria and weakens the centralized coordination record. Exporting every clash and manually filtering the spreadsheet introduces unnecessary effort and increases the risk of omitting or misclassifying issues. Assigning clashes through the Issues tool is appropriate after clashes have been reviewed and determined to require action, but assignment does not itself generate the requested filtered clash report.

Reference topics: Autodesk Model Coordination; custom coordination views; clash filtering; clash matrices; published models; active-clash reporting; location-based coordination.


Get Premium BIM_MGT_101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
PA
Pamela 15 days ago
Definitely A. Quick and precise reporting is key.
LO
Lore 20 days ago
I feel like option C is too manual. Not practical for our timeline.
GL
Glendora 25 days ago
Option D is interesting. Assigning issues might help collaboration.
MO
Mona 1 month ago
Option B could work, but it’s slower. Too many perspectives.
KA
Kayleigh 1 month ago
I agree! It’s efficient to filter clashes directly.
DO
Dorinda 1 month ago
I think option A is the best. Custom views save time.
GL
Glen 2 months ago
Wait, can we really trust the clash matrix to be accurate?
NI
Nida 2 months ago
D) seems like a good team approach, but will it slow things down?
LO
Loreen 2 months ago
C) sounds like a lot of extra work, why not just use A)?
CR
Crista 2 months ago
I disagree, B) could lead to missed issues.
AN
Annalee 2 months ago
A) is the quickest way to get just what they need.
DE
Deangelo 2 months ago
I recall that having each discipline review their own clashes, like in option B, might lead to missed issues. It seems less efficient for this scenario.
AM
Amie 3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where filtering clashes was key. I feel like manually filtering in option C could be too time-consuming.
AR
Arminda 3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Issues tool being useful for tracking problems. Maybe option D could work too?
TR
Troy 3 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense since creating a custom view should help focus on just the active clashes we need.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel