Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL Questions]

What if the project isn't big enough to justify extensive testing..?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Loreta at Jan 05, 2023, 11:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Essie
4 months ago
Wait, can you really skip testing entirely? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
5 months ago
Not sure if automation is worth it for tiny projects...
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
5 months ago
Both A and B make sense for small projects!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
5 months ago
I think automation tools can save time too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
5 months ago
Risk-based analysis is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about prioritizing tests, so I guess A makes sense, but I’m not confident about B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
5 months ago
I feel like both options could work, but I lean towards A since it seems more focused on the project's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
I think using automation tools could save time, but I'm not sure if they’re worth it for smaller projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I remember we talked about risk-based analysis in class, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply it here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Screen Flow question. I'd start by considering the options and thinking about which one would be most appropriate for allowing the end-user to make a selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
6 months ago
I think TPV stands for Total Partner Value, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about advertising costs, but the options don't seem to directly address that. I'll need to carefully read through the choices and try to connect them back to the prompt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
6 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The question is asking if the statement about the three layers is true or false. I think I remember learning about those layers, so I'll go with true and hope I'm right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
11 months ago
Option C all the way! And if you're still not convinced, just tell your boss you need to 'automate the heck out of it.' That'll get their attention.
upvoted 0 times
Buddy
10 months ago
C) Both a and b
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
B) Use automation tool for testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
A) Use risk based analysis to find out which areas need to be tested
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Domitila
11 months ago
Option D? Really? What are they thinking? That's just lazy testing, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
11 months ago
I'd go with Option C as well. Doing everything manually for a small project sounds like a waste of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
Nu
9 months ago
Manual testing for a small project would be too time consuming
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
9 months ago
Agreed, using both methods would be the most efficient approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
9 months ago
Automation tools can definitely help speed up the testing process
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
I think using risk based analysis is a good idea
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
9 months ago
Manual testing can be time-consuming and may not be necessary for smaller projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
10 months ago
It's important to prioritize testing efforts based on the project size and complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
10 months ago
I agree, using risk based analysis and automation tools can save a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
Option C seems like the most efficient choice for small projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
11 months ago
I agree, a combination of risk assessment and automation is the way to go. Gotta make the most of limited resources, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
11 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. Risk-based analysis and automation tools can help optimize testing even for smaller projects.
upvoted 0 times
Geraldine
11 months ago
I agree, using both risk-based analysis and automation tools can help ensure that the most critical areas are tested efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
11 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. Risk-based analysis and automation tools can help optimize testing even for smaller projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tony
11 months ago
But we can also use automation tools to speed up testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
11 months ago
I agree with Mike, focusing on high-risk areas is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
12 months ago
I think we should use risk based analysis to prioritize testing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel