ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 4

[All CTFL Questions]

In the MASPAR case study..?

ASecurity failures were the result of untested parts of code

BThe development team achieved complete statement and branch coverage but missed a serious bug in the MASPAR operating system

CAn error in the code was so obscure that you had to test the function with almost every input value to find its two special-case failures

DAll the above

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Thaddeus at May 06, 2022, 03:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

5 months ago

I heard the security failures were due to untested code parts.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm a little confused by the different NAT options here. I'll need to review the differences between stateful and stateless, as well as the differences between NAT64 and NAT66. This is going to take some careful thinking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

6 months ago

Easy peasy. Inline is the mode that blocks flows, since the traffic goes through the Snort engine. Tap just inspects a copy, so the original traffic keeps flowing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

6 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'll carefully analyze the code and the options to determine the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hailey

6 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of details to consider, and I want to make sure I fully understand the implications of the articles of association before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosina

6 months ago

Making the new node a secondary PAN seems like it could work, but I feel like adding the DNS entry is more essential for successful deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annamaria

Alyce

Jessenia

Justine

Herminia

Deeanna

Daron

Roxane

Hailey

Rosina