U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

In the MASPAR case study..?
C) An error in the code was so obscure that you had to test the function with almost every input value to find its two special-case failures
A) Security failures were the result of untested parts of code
B) The development team achieved complete statement and branch coverage but missed a serious bug in the MASPAR operating system
D) All the above

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL Questions]

In the MASPAR case study..?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Thaddeus at May 06, 2022, 03:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annamaria
8 months ago
All of the above sounds right to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
8 months ago
I think the obscure error is a bit exaggerated, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
8 months ago
Wait, they had complete coverage but still missed a bug? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
8 months ago
Totally agree, that’s a classic oversight!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
8 months ago
I heard the security failures were due to untested code parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different NAT options here. I'll need to review the differences between stateful and stateless, as well as the differences between NAT64 and NAT66. This is going to take some careful thinking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
9 months ago
Easy peasy. Inline is the mode that blocks flows, since the traffic goes through the Snort engine. Tap just inspects a copy, so the original traffic keeps flowing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
9 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I'll carefully analyze the code and the options to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
9 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of details to consider, and I want to make sure I fully understand the implications of the articles of association before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
9 months ago
Making the new node a secondary PAN seems like it could work, but I feel like adding the DNS entry is more essential for successful deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel