I vaguely recall something about the purpose of testing being to find defects, not just to prove they don't exist, so I'm a bit skeptical about option D.
I think the answer is C. The idea of exhaustive testing is a common misconception that one of the key principles addresses. Can't test every possible scenario, so you have to be strategic about your testing approach.
Wait, I'm a little confused. Are we supposed to be talking about automated testing vs. manual testing? Or is this about the purpose of testing? I want to make sure I understand the question properly.
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - it's normally impossible to test all input/output combinations for a software system.
Option A sounds tempting, but I think C is the way to go. Automated tests are great, but they can't catch everything. Manual testing is still essential.
I'm going with Option D. The purpose of testing is to demonstrate the absence of defects, not to find them. Clearly, the best software is one with zero defects, right?
Option C is the best answer. It's simply not possible to test every possible input and output combination for a software system. That's just basic software testing knowledge.
Darrin
3 months agoAndra
3 months agoAnglea
3 months agoSelma
3 months agoChandra
3 months agoPaola
4 months agoVenita
4 months agoTerrilyn
4 months agoRodrigo
4 months agoCarin
5 months agoCyndy
5 months agoChantell
5 months agoKaran
5 months agoStevie
5 months agoBilly
6 months agoFrance
6 months agoYvonne
2 months agoMerlyn
2 months agoDarci
2 months agoBrandon
4 months agoTambra
6 months agoSabrina
7 months agoRolland
7 months agoJanet
7 months agoCherry
6 months agoJennie
6 months agoWalker
7 months agoBilly
7 months ago