Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL Questions]

The difference between re-testing and regression testing is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vonda
4 months ago
I thought re-testing was just for checking fixes, not side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
5 months ago
A makes the most sense, for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
5 months ago
Wait, isn't regression testing just re-running tests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
Totally agree with A! Regression testing is crucial for side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
A is correct! Re-testing is about fixing bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
5 months ago
I might be mixing them up, but I thought re-testing was done in the same environment as the original tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
5 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I believe re-testing is specifically after a fix, whereas regression is broader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about regression testing looking for side effects. That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
I think re-testing is about checking if the bugs are fixed, while regression testing is more about ensuring nothing else broke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that each guest is independent, so the maximum number the LTM Specialist can upgrade at once is one. B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the statements. Let me re-read them carefully and think through the role of IT Financial Management to figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the rights of the account owner, so I need to focus on that and not get distracted by the other details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
10 months ago
Haha, I love these trick questions! I'm going to go with A, but I'm also tempted to pick E just for the comedic value of developers doing regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
10 months ago
I'm going with D. That just makes the most sense to me - re-testing uses different environments, while regression testing uses the same one.
upvoted 0 times
Nenita
9 months ago
I agree with you on D. It's crucial to have a consistent environment for regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
9 months ago
Actually, I believe the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
10 months ago
I think D is correct too. It's important to use the same environment for regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmett
11 months ago
This is a tricky one! I was debating between A and B, but I think A makes the most sense. Re-testing is just repeating the same tests, while regression testing is about finding new issues.
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
9 months ago
Yes, A is the best option. Re-testing is simply running tests again, while regression testing is all about uncovering unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
10 months ago
I agree, A is the right choice. Re-testing is about repeating tests, while regression testing is focused on finding new issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
10 months ago
I think A is correct. Re-testing is running the same test again, while regression testing is looking for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C might be the right answer, since re-testing is usually done after fixes are made, and regression testing is earlier in the process.
upvoted 0 times
Audria
9 months ago
I think you might be right. B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
9 months ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
9 months ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think it's actually A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
9 months ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
I think you might be onto something. B does make sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
10 months ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think the correct answer is actually A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurene
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
10 months ago
Yes, and regression testing is looking for any new issues that may have been introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
10 months ago
I agree, re-testing is just running the same test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaniqua
11 months ago
I see your point, but I think re-testing is done after faults are fixed, while regression testing is done earlier to catch any new issues that may arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
11 months ago
I agree with you, Josephine. Re-testing is more about making sure the same test passes again, while regression testing is about checking for unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
11 months ago
I think the difference is that re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel