MENU
The difference between re-testing and regression testing is:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CTFL Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
VO
Vonda
12 months ago
I thought re-testing was just for checking fixes, not side effects.
MA
Mariko
1 year ago
A makes the most sense, for sure!
DE
Deja
1 year ago
Wait, isn't regression testing just re-running tests?
CH
Chantay
1 year ago
Totally agree with A! Regression testing is crucial for side effects.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
A is correct! Re-testing is about fixing bugs.
CA
Casandra
1 year ago
I might be mixing them up, but I thought re-testing was done in the same environment as the original tests.
SH
Shad
1 year ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I believe re-testing is specifically after a fix, whereas regression is broader.
CA
Catrice
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about regression testing looking for side effects. That sounds familiar.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
I think re-testing is about checking if the bugs are fixed, while regression testing is more about ensuring nothing else broke.
SE
Sena
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that each guest is independent, so the maximum number the LTM Specialist can upgrade at once is one. B is the correct answer.
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the statements. Let me re-read them carefully and think through the role of IT Financial Management to figure out the best answer.
CR
Crista
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the rights of the account owner, so I need to focus on that and not get distracted by the other details.
AR
Art
1 year ago
Haha, I love these trick questions! I'm going to go with A, but I'm also tempted to pick E just for the comedic value of developers doing regression testing.
AL
Aleta
1 year ago
I'm going with D. That just makes the most sense to me - re-testing uses different environments, while regression testing uses the same one.
NE
Nenita
1 year ago
I agree with you on D. It's crucial to have a consistent environment for regression testing.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Actually, I believe the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
RI
Ricarda
1 year ago
I think D is correct too. It's important to use the same environment for regression testing.
EM
Emmett
2 years ago
This is a tricky one! I was debating between A and B, but I think A makes the most sense. Re-testing is just repeating the same tests, while regression testing is about finding new issues.
ST
Stefanie
1 year ago
Yes, A is the best option. Re-testing is simply running tests again, while regression testing is all about uncovering unexpected side effects.
AL
Alease
1 year ago
I agree, A is the right choice. Re-testing is about repeating tests, while regression testing is focused on finding new issues.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
I think A is correct. Re-testing is running the same test again, while regression testing is looking for unexpected side effects.
KR
Kristeen
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C might be the right answer, since re-testing is usually done after fixes are made, and regression testing is earlier in the process.
AU
Audria
1 year ago
I think you might be right. B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
RO
Rosio
1 year ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
FR
Franchesca
1 year ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think it's actually A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
TU
Tula
1 year ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
LE
Lezlie
1 year ago
I think you might be onto something. B does make sense in this context.
SH
Sharika
1 year ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
MI
Michell
1 year ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think the correct answer is actually A.
OL
Oliva
1 year ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
LA
Laurene
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
TI
Tiffiny
1 year ago
Yes, and regression testing is looking for any new issues that may have been introduced.
SH
Shawnta
1 year ago
I agree, re-testing is just running the same test again.
SH
Shaniqua
2 years ago
I see your point, but I think re-testing is done after faults are fixed, while regression testing is done earlier to catch any new issues that may arise.
OM
Omega
2 years ago
I agree with you, Josephine. Re-testing is more about making sure the same test passes again, while regression testing is about checking for unintended consequences.
JO
Josephine
2 years ago
I think the difference is that re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.