Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

The difference between re-testing and regression testing is:
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
C) Re-testing is done after faults are fixed; regression testing is done earlier
D) Re-testing uses different environments, regression testing uses the same environment
E) Re-testing is done by developers, regression testing is done by independent testers

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL Questions]

The difference between re-testing and regression testing is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Art at Nov 20, 2022, 12:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vonda
9 months ago
I thought re-testing was just for checking fixes, not side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
9 months ago
A makes the most sense, for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
9 months ago
Wait, isn't regression testing just re-running tests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
9 months ago
Totally agree with A! Regression testing is crucial for side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
A is correct! Re-testing is about fixing bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
10 months ago
I might be mixing them up, but I thought re-testing was done in the same environment as the original tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
10 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I believe re-testing is specifically after a fix, whereas regression is broader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about regression testing looking for side effects. That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
10 months ago
I think re-testing is about checking if the bugs are fixed, while regression testing is more about ensuring nothing else broke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that each guest is independent, so the maximum number the LTM Specialist can upgrade at once is one. B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the statements. Let me re-read them carefully and think through the role of IT Financial Management to figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the rights of the account owner, so I need to focus on that and not get distracted by the other details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
Haha, I love these trick questions! I'm going to go with A, but I'm also tempted to pick E just for the comedic value of developers doing regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
I'm going with D. That just makes the most sense to me - re-testing uses different environments, while regression testing uses the same one.
upvoted 0 times
Nenita
1 year ago
I agree with you on D. It's crucial to have a consistent environment for regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 year ago
Actually, I believe the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 year ago
I think D is correct too. It's important to use the same environment for regression testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmett
1 year ago
This is a tricky one! I was debating between A and B, but I think A makes the most sense. Re-testing is just repeating the same tests, while regression testing is about finding new issues.
upvoted 0 times
Stefanie
1 year ago
Yes, A is the best option. Re-testing is simply running tests again, while regression testing is all about uncovering unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 year ago
I agree, A is the right choice. Re-testing is about repeating tests, while regression testing is focused on finding new issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
1 year ago
I think A is correct. Re-testing is running the same test again, while regression testing is looking for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C might be the right answer, since re-testing is usually done after fixes are made, and regression testing is earlier in the process.
upvoted 0 times
Audria
1 year ago
I think you might be right. B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 year ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think it's actually A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
1 year ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
I think you might be onto something. B does make sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
B) Re-testing looks for unexpected side effects; regression testing is repeating those tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
1 year ago
Hmm, I see what you mean. But I think the correct answer is actually A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 year ago
A) Re-testing is running a test again; regression testing looks for unexpected side effects
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurene
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A. Re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
1 year ago
Yes, and regression testing is looking for any new issues that may have been introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
1 year ago
I agree, re-testing is just running the same test again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaniqua
1 year ago
I see your point, but I think re-testing is done after faults are fixed, while regression testing is done earlier to catch any new issues that may arise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 year ago
I agree with you, Josephine. Re-testing is more about making sure the same test passes again, while regression testing is about checking for unintended consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
1 year ago
I think the difference is that re-testing is running a test again, while regression testing looks for unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel