Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 1 Question 75 Discussion

An input field takes the year of birth between 1900 and 2004. The boundary values for testing this field are:
C) 1899,1900,2004,2005
A) 0,1900,2004,2005
B) 1900, 2004
D) 1899, 1900, 1901,2003,2004,2005

ASTQB CTFL Exam - Topic 1 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASTQB's CTFL exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL Questions]

An input field takes the year of birth between 1900 and 2004. The boundary values for testing this field are:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Arlie at Sep 16, 2024, 05:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ressie
8 months ago
C is wrong because 1899 is outside the range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
8 months ago
Wait, 2005 isn't even allowed? That's weird!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
8 months ago
I think A has too many out-of-range values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
9 months ago
Definitely B, those are the only valid years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
9 months ago
The boundary values are 1900 and 2004.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought we needed to test values just inside and outside the boundaries, which makes D seem like a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
9 months ago
I feel like we did a similar question in practice, and I think we included values just outside the limits, so maybe C is right with 1899 and 2005.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
10 months ago
I think the correct answer should only include the minimum and maximum values, so maybe it's B with just 1900 and 2004.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
10 months ago
I remember we talked about boundary values in class, but I'm not sure if we should include values outside the range like 2005.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
10 months ago
I'm not sure if I need to test all those values or if a few key boundary cases would be sufficient. I'll start with 1900 and 2004 and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
10 months ago
I've got this! I'll test the full range of valid values, 1900 to 2004, as well as the invalid values 0, 1899, and 2005 to ensure the field is working as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Should I also test the values outside the valid range, like 1899 and 2005? I want to make sure the field is properly validating the input.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
10 months ago
Okay, this looks straightforward. I'll test the boundary values of 1900 and 2004 to make sure the input field is accepting the valid range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to make sure we're prioritizing available products in the search results. Option B looks like the way to go - adjusting the boost factor for availability in the searchable attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the developer who wrote this input field is still living in the 19th century. Let's test 1800 just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
2 years ago
Wait, what if the input field accepts negative years? This test is clearly not comprehensive enough.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
2 years ago
User 3: But what if the input field accepts negative years? The test should include those cases too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
2 years ago
I think option B) 1900, 2004 is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
2 years ago
The boundary values for testing the year of birth input field are 1900 and 2004.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Beckie
2 years ago
Nah, I'm going with C. Gotta test the invalid values too, you know, just to be thorough.
upvoted 0 times
Julene
2 years ago
C seems like a good choice to test the boundaries. It covers both valid and invalid values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A might be the answer. It includes some invalid values as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
I agree with you, B seems to be the right choice for testing the input field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 years ago
I think B is the correct answer. Just testing the boundary values.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
2 years ago
Really? I was sure the answer was D. Gotta include all the values from 1899 to 2005 to cover the full range.
upvoted 0 times
Daron
2 years ago
I agree with you, the answer should include all values from 1899 to 2005 like D) 1899, 1900, 1901, 2003, 2004, 2005.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 years ago
No, it's actually A) 0, 1900, 2004, 2005.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is B) 1900, 2004.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paz
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) 0, 1900, 2004, 2005 covers all possible scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is B. 1900 and 2004 are the boundary values for the input field.
upvoted 0 times
Tanesha
2 years ago
Exactly, testing those boundary values should cover all possible scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 years ago
So, we only need to test for 1900 and 2004 to ensure the input field is working correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
2 years ago
Yes, those are the only values that fall within the specified range.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 years ago
I agree, the correct answer is B. 1900 and 2004 are the boundary values.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alba
2 years ago
I agree with Pearlene, option B) makes sense because it includes the minimum and maximum valid years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
2 years ago
I think the boundary values for testing this field are option B) 1900, 2004.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel