Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQE Exam - Topic 8 Question 73 Discussion

In a failure mode and effects analysis (FXIEA). the focus should be on
A) classifying as failures those items with risk priority numbers greater than 100
B) creating flowchans for the items with high risk priority number or occurrence values
C) implementing corrective action on items that have high alpha risk values
D) implementing corrective action on items that have high risk priority number or severity values

ASQ CQE Exam - Topic 8 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 8
[All CQE Questions]

In a failure mode and effects analysis (FXIEA). the focus should be on

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Amber at Aug 09, 2023, 05:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Renea
8 months ago
I thought high alpha risk values were more important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
8 months ago
A is too specific, we need a broader approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
8 months ago
Wait, are we really focusing on severity values? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
8 months ago
Totally agree, D is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
9 months ago
I think it's all about the risk priority numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
9 months ago
I think we discussed the importance of corrective actions, but I can't remember if it was specifically tied to high severity values or just high risk priority numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the alpha risk values. I don’t recall them being a major focus in our studies, so I’m leaning towards something more straightforward like option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this where we had to prioritize failures based on severity and occurrence. I feel like option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
9 months ago
I think we focused a lot on risk priority numbers in class, but I'm not sure if it's just about those over 100 or if we should consider other factors too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about resolving a deployment plan issue. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about the different Android components and how they relate to permissions. Let me think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
10 months ago
I'm kind of lost here. I thought embedding keys in code was risky, so that can't be right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The two conditions that need to be satisfied are A and B. The parent entity needs to be a wholly owned subsidiary, and the ultimate parent needs to publish consolidated financial statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
I'm gonna have to go with Option D on this one. Implementing corrective action on high-risk items is the whole point of a FMEA, isn't it? Unless, of course, you're a fan of just letting things fail. *cue dramatic music*
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 year ago
Absolutely, we can't just ignore the items with high risk priority numbers or severity values. Corrective action is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 year ago
It's all about taking action on those high-risk items to avoid potential problems down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high risk priority numbers or severity values is crucial for preventing failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. We need to address those high-risk items.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
Ha! Clearly, the answer is Option A. Who doesn't love a good failure classification? That's the real meat and potatoes of a FMEA, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Ludivina
1 year ago
Actually, I believe Option C is the best choice. Implementing corrective action on items with high alpha risk values is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
1 year ago
I disagree, Option B is more important. Creating flowcharts for high risk items can help visualize the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
1 year ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Corrective action on high risk priority or severity items is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Shouldn't we be looking at the overall risk rather than just the priority number or severity? I think Option B might be a better approach.
upvoted 0 times
Gerardo
1 year ago
User 3: I think implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, but maybe we should also consider creating flowcharts for items with high risk priority numbers or occurrence values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should focus on classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margret
1 year ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values makes the most sense for a FMEA.
upvoted 0 times
Jolene
1 year ago
By addressing items with high-risk priority numbers or severity values, we can improve overall system reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
1 year ago
Implementing corrective action on high-risk items can help prevent failures in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
1 year ago
It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
Absolutely, it helps in ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to mitigate the most significant risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
1 year ago
That way, we can address the most critical issues first and prevent potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Argelia
1 year ago
But what about classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100? Shouldn't that be a priority too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
I agree with Paz. It's important to address the items that pose the highest risk first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 year ago
I think the focus should be on implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel