MENU
In a failure mode and effects analysis (FXIEA). the focus should be on
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CQE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
RE
Renea
11 months ago
I thought high alpha risk values were more important?
ER
Ernestine
11 months ago
A is too specific, we need a broader approach.
KA
Kattie
11 months ago
Wait, are we really focusing on severity values? Seems off.
LE
Leslee
11 months ago
Totally agree, D is the way to go!
CL
Clarinda
12 months ago
I think it's all about the risk priority numbers.
LO
Lorrie
12 months ago
I think we discussed the importance of corrective actions, but I can't remember if it was specifically tied to high severity values or just high risk priority numbers.
MI
Millie
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the alpha risk values. I don’t recall them being a major focus in our studies, so I’m leaning towards something more straightforward like option B.
DE
Deangelo
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this where we had to prioritize failures based on severity and occurrence. I feel like option D might be the right choice.
MI
Mila
1 year ago
I think we focused a lot on risk priority numbers in class, but I'm not sure if it's just about those over 100 or if we should consider other factors too.
EL
Elmira
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about resolving a deployment plan issue. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one would be the best approach.
RA
Rasheeda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about the different Android components and how they relate to permissions. Let me think this through.
CH
Chau
1 year ago
I'm kind of lost here. I thought embedding keys in code was risky, so that can't be right?
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The two conditions that need to be satisfied are A and B. The parent entity needs to be a wholly owned subsidiary, and the ultimate parent needs to publish consolidated financial statements.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
I'm gonna have to go with Option D on this one. Implementing corrective action on high-risk items is the whole point of a FMEA, isn't it? Unless, of course, you're a fan of just letting things fail. *cue dramatic music*
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
Absolutely, we can't just ignore the items with high risk priority numbers or severity values. Corrective action is key.
OL
Oliva
1 year ago
It's all about taking action on those high-risk items to avoid potential problems down the line.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high risk priority numbers or severity values is crucial for preventing failures.
NE
Nelida
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. We need to address those high-risk items.
RE
Reynalda
1 year ago
Ha! Clearly, the answer is Option A. Who doesn't love a good failure classification? That's the real meat and potatoes of a FMEA, right? *wink wink*
LU
Ludivina
1 year ago
Actually, I believe Option C is the best choice. Implementing corrective action on items with high alpha risk values is key.
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
I disagree, Option B is more important. Creating flowcharts for high risk items can help visualize the process.
DI
Diane
1 year ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Corrective action on high risk priority or severity items is crucial.
NI
Nickolas
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Shouldn't we be looking at the overall risk rather than just the priority number or severity? I think Option B might be a better approach.
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
User 3: I think implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values is crucial.
JA
Janella
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, but maybe we should also consider creating flowcharts for items with high risk priority numbers or occurrence values.
MI
Mindy
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should focus on classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100.
MA
Margret
1 year ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. Focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values makes the most sense for a FMEA.
JO
Jolene
1 year ago
By addressing items with high-risk priority numbers or severity values, we can improve overall system reliability.
IO
Iola
1 year ago
Implementing corrective action on high-risk items can help prevent failures in the future.
MI
Milly
1 year ago
It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.
TA
Talia
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Absolutely, it helps in ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to mitigate the most significant risks.
BO
Bong
1 year ago
That way, we can address the most critical issues first and prevent potential failures.
TR
Trina
1 year ago
It's important to prioritize corrective action on items that pose the highest risk.
AN
Anabel
1 year ago
I agree, focusing on items with high-risk priority number or severity values is crucial for FMEA.
AR
Argelia
2 years ago
But what about classifying failures with risk priority numbers greater than 100? Shouldn't that be a priority too?
AV
Avery
2 years ago
I agree with Paz. It's important to address the items that pose the highest risk first.
PA
Paz
2 years ago
I think the focus should be on implementing corrective action on items with high risk priority number or severity values.