ASQ Exam CQE Topic 7 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam

Question #: 100
Topic #: 7

[All CQE Questions]

When requesting "worst case" design analysis, you expect the reliability group to

AAnalyze the worst rejects.

BAnalyze only those products failing to meet specification requirements.

CDetermine whether product requirements can be met with subassemblies assumed at their worst combination of tolerances.

DAssume all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Chandra at Sep 13, 2024, 05:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Barney

2 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Might as well set everything to 'Doom' mode and see how it holds up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Basilia

2 months ago

C looks promising, but D really dives into the nitty-gritty of the worst-case analysis. Gotta love those maximum limit assumptions!

upvoted 0 times

Isaiah

21 days ago

B) Analyze only those products failing to meet specification requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

23 days ago

C) I agree, it's important to consider the worst combination of tolerances for reliability analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

25 days ago

D) Assume all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rachael

2 months ago

C) Determine whether product requirements can be met with subassemblies assumed at their worst combination of tolerances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

2 months ago

Haha, D is the way to go! Might as well crank everything up to 11 and see what happens. Better safe than sorry, right?

upvoted 0 times

Gladys

22 days ago

User 3: It's always good to have that extra margin of safety.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

26 days ago

User 2: I agree, better to be prepared for the worst case scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

1 months ago

User 1: Yeah, D is definitely the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

3 months ago

While options B and C are good, I think D covers the broadest range of potential issues. Gotta prepare for the apocalypse, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Anastacia

2 months ago

I see your point, but considering all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit seems like the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

2 months ago

True, but analyzing the worst rejects could also help identify potential issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

2 months ago

But wouldn't it be more efficient to focus on just the products failing to meet specifications?

upvoted 0 times

...

Crista

3 months ago

I agree, option D does cover a wide range of possibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be D. Assuming all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit seems like a safe approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corazon

3 months ago

Option D seems the most comprehensive approach to analyzing the worst-case scenario. Assuming all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit ensures a thorough evaluation.

upvoted 0 times

Dorthy

2 months ago

I agree, assuming all subassembly tolerances at their maximum limit ensures a thorough evaluation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

3 months ago

Option D seems the most comprehensive approach to analyzing the worst-case scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

4 months ago

I agree with Gwenn, because analyzing the worst combination of tolerances ensures reliability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

4 months ago

I think the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...