MENU
An engineer has been asked to identify and apply an absolutely objective metric to evaluate risk. The best response is
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CQE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
CO
Cordelia
10 months ago
Totally agree, option A is spot on!
ME
Merilyn
11 months ago
Wait, can we really measure risk objectively? Seems tricky.
LE
Lenna
11 months ago
Lean metrics make sense, less waste = less risk.
AR
Armando
11 months ago
I think six sigma is the way to go!
EV
Eveline
11 months ago
Absolutely objective metrics for risk? Good luck with that!
MA
Margot
12 months ago
Quality function deployment in option D sounds interesting, but I’m not convinced it’s truly objective.
AL
Alise
12 months ago
Six Sigma metrics seem like a solid choice in option C, but I wonder if they really capture all aspects of risk.
GO
Goldie
12 months ago
I’m not sure about the lean metrics in option B. I feel like they focus more on efficiency than actual risk measurement.
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
I remember discussing how risk is often subjective, so I think option A might be the best choice.
LI
Lili
1 year ago
I think I'm going to go with option A. An "absolutely objective" risk metric just doesn't seem feasible in the real world. Gotta be willing to accept some subjectivity.
KE
Kent
1 year ago
Six Sigma could be a good approach, but I'm not convinced it's the "best" option. Might depend on the specific context and type of risk we're talking about.
LE
Levi
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Seems like the most realistic answer - risk is inherently subjective and hard to quantify objectively.
FR
France
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if there's really an "absolutely objective" way to measure risk. Might have to think outside the box a bit here.
KE
Kenda
1 year ago
Quality function deployment could work, but I'm not sure it's the most "objective" metric. Might be more focused on customer perception than pure risk assessment.
TH
Thomasena
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the best description of continuous integration.
IN
In
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll have to review my notes on the benefits of color in advertising before deciding.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll apply my knowledge of user and group management to determine the correct statement.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
Wait, are we supposed to 'apply an absolutely objective metric' to something inherently subjective? Talk about an oxymoron!
VI
Victor
1 year ago
D) Quality function deployment focuses on customer perception, which is a great way to evaluate risk.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
D) quality function deployment, to minimize risk as perceived by the customer
KR
Kristal
1 year ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
TE
Teddy
1 year ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
ST
Stephane
1 year ago
B) Lean metrics? Minimizing waste doesn't automatically minimize risk. That's too simplistic.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
A) makes sense, risk is inherently subjective and can't be measured objectively.
MI
Michal
1 year ago
C) six sigma metrics, because a thoroughly controlled process minimizes risk
MI
Michal
1 year ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
MI
Michal
1 year ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
DO
Dorothy
2 years ago
But what about six sigma metrics? They focus on controlling processes to minimize risk
SH
Shanda
2 years ago
I agree with Jovita, it's difficult to have a completely objective metric for risk
JO
Jovita
2 years ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist