Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASQ CQE Exam - Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

An engineer has been asked to identify and apply an absolutely objective metric to evaluate risk. The best response is
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
C) six sigma metrics, because a thoroughly controlled process minimizes risk
D) quality function deployment, to minimize risk as perceived by the customer

ASQ CQE Exam - Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All CQE Questions]

An engineer has been asked to identify and apply an absolutely objective metric to evaluate risk. The best response is

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Cordelia
7 months ago
Totally agree, option A is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
8 months ago
Wait, can we really measure risk objectively? Seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Lean metrics make sense, less waste = less risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
8 months ago
I think six sigma is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
8 months ago
Absolutely objective metrics for risk? Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
9 months ago
Quality function deployment in option D sounds interesting, but I’m not convinced it’s truly objective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
9 months ago
Six Sigma metrics seem like a solid choice in option C, but I wonder if they really capture all aspects of risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
I’m not sure about the lean metrics in option B. I feel like they focus more on efficiency than actual risk measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
9 months ago
I remember discussing how risk is often subjective, so I think option A might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
9 months ago
I think I'm going to go with option A. An "absolutely objective" risk metric just doesn't seem feasible in the real world. Gotta be willing to accept some subjectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
9 months ago
Six Sigma could be a good approach, but I'm not convinced it's the "best" option. Might depend on the specific context and type of risk we're talking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Seems like the most realistic answer - risk is inherently subjective and hard to quantify objectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if there's really an "absolutely objective" way to measure risk. Might have to think outside the box a bit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
9 months ago
Quality function deployment could work, but I'm not sure it's the most "objective" metric. Might be more focused on customer perception than pure risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the best description of continuous integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll have to review my notes on the benefits of color in advertising before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll apply my knowledge of user and group management to determine the correct statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
Wait, are we supposed to 'apply an absolutely objective metric' to something inherently subjective? Talk about an oxymoron!
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
D) Quality function deployment focuses on customer perception, which is a great way to evaluate risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
1 year ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
Janna
1 year ago
D) quality function deployment, to minimize risk as perceived by the customer
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
1 year ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 year ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephane
1 year ago
B) Lean metrics? Minimizing waste doesn't automatically minimize risk. That's too simplistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
A) makes sense, risk is inherently subjective and can't be measured objectively.
upvoted 0 times
Michal
1 year ago
C) six sigma metrics, because a thoroughly controlled process minimizes risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
1 year ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
1 year ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
But what about six sigma metrics? They focus on controlling processes to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 year ago
I agree with Jovita, it's difficult to have a completely objective metric for risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
1 year ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel