New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASQ CQE Exam - Topic 1 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASQ's CQE exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 1
[All CQE Questions]

An engineer has been asked to identify and apply an absolutely objective metric to evaluate risk. The best response is

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lou at Jul 15, 2024, 12:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CQE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cordelia
3 months ago
Totally agree, option A is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
3 months ago
Wait, can we really measure risk objectively? Seems tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
Lean metrics make sense, less waste = less risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
4 months ago
I think six sigma is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
4 months ago
Absolutely objective metrics for risk? Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
4 months ago
Quality function deployment in option D sounds interesting, but I’m not convinced it’s truly objective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
4 months ago
Six Sigma metrics seem like a solid choice in option C, but I wonder if they really capture all aspects of risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
4 months ago
I’m not sure about the lean metrics in option B. I feel like they focus more on efficiency than actual risk measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
5 months ago
I remember discussing how risk is often subjective, so I think option A might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
I think I'm going to go with option A. An "absolutely objective" risk metric just doesn't seem feasible in the real world. Gotta be willing to accept some subjectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
5 months ago
Six Sigma could be a good approach, but I'm not convinced it's the "best" option. Might depend on the specific context and type of risk we're talking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Seems like the most realistic answer - risk is inherently subjective and hard to quantify objectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if there's really an "absolutely objective" way to measure risk. Might have to think outside the box a bit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
5 months ago
Quality function deployment could work, but I'm not sure it's the most "objective" metric. Might be more focused on customer perception than pure risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the best description of continuous integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll have to review my notes on the benefits of color in advertising before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll apply my knowledge of user and group management to determine the correct statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
9 months ago
Wait, are we supposed to 'apply an absolutely objective metric' to something inherently subjective? Talk about an oxymoron!
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
9 months ago
D) Quality function deployment focuses on customer perception, which is a great way to evaluate risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
9 months ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
Janna
8 months ago
D) quality function deployment, to minimize risk as perceived by the customer
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
8 months ago
C) Six Sigma is all about process control, not risk assessment. That's not the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
8 months ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
9 months ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephane
9 months ago
B) Lean metrics? Minimizing waste doesn't automatically minimize risk. That's too simplistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
A) makes sense, risk is inherently subjective and can't be measured objectively.
upvoted 0 times
Michal
8 months ago
C) six sigma metrics, because a thoroughly controlled process minimizes risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
8 months ago
B) lean metrics, because to minimize waste is to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
9 months ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
11 months ago
But what about six sigma metrics? They focus on controlling processes to minimize risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
11 months ago
I agree with Jovita, it's difficult to have a completely objective metric for risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
11 months ago
A) an absolutely objective way to measure risk does not exist
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel