New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS PSP Exam - Topic 7 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 7
[All PSP Questions]

What applies to a provider of defective or hazardous products or services that unduly threaten a consumer's personal safety?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Virgina at Jun 21, 2024, 07:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Phyliss
3 months ago
I think it could be B too, depends on the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
3 months ago
Definitely A, manufacturers need to be held accountable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's strict liability? Seems too harsh.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
4 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about consumer safety!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
Strict liability applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
4 months ago
I thought the defendant is the one being accused, so that doesn't seem right for this question. Maybe it's A after all?
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and strict liability was definitely mentioned in relation to hazardous products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about how plaintiffs have to prove negligence in some cases, which makes me hesitate about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
I think the answer might be A, strict liability, because it seems to apply when a product is defective and causes harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the legal doctrine that applies to providers of unsafe products or services. Based on that, I'm going to go with option A, strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know strict liability has to do with product safety, but I'm not confident that's the right answer here. I might need to review my notes on this topic before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about product liability. I think the answer is strict liability, since that applies to providers of defective or hazardous products that threaten consumer safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Is it asking about the party that is liable, or the legal standard that applies? I'll need to re-read it carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. If IsICP is enabled, that means the ICP account is being used for intercompany transactions, so the answer is likely C. The ICP account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
5 months ago
I think option C is the most comprehensive description. It mentions the ISR 1000 has SD-WAN, security, and wired/wireless access, which sounds like a high-performance platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
5 months ago
The key here is understanding the OSPF roles and how they interact in a broadcast network. I'll review my notes on that to make sure I pick the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
10 months ago
Easy peasy, it's strict liability all the way. Unless, of course, you're a superhero with the ability to make everything safe. In that case, option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Corrina
8 months ago
Well, unless you're a superhero, it's definitely strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
8 months ago
D) None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
8 months ago
Not the defendant, it's strict liability that applies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
9 months ago
C) Defendant
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
9 months ago
No, it's not the plaintiff, it's strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
10 months ago
B) Plaintiff
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
10 months ago
Definitely strict liability, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
10 months ago
A) Strict liability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Idella
10 months ago
Strict liability is the way to go. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the product manufacturing kitchen!
upvoted 0 times
Wilbert
10 months ago
Yeah, if you're putting out dangerous products, you should be held accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
10 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
11 months ago
Ah, the old 'who's to blame' game. I'm going with option A - strict liability. Gotta keep those consumers safe, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Caren
9 months ago
It's a good way to ensure consumer safety and hold companies accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
9 months ago
Definitely, the responsibility should fall on the provider in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
10 months ago
Yeah, it's important for consumers to be protected from defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
10 months ago
I agree, option A - strict liability makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
11 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the correct answer here. The provider is responsible for any harm caused by their defective or hazardous products, regardless of negligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
11 months ago
D) None of the above because sometimes accidents happen and it may not always be the provider's fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
11 months ago
C) Defendant because they are the ones being accused of providing defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
11 months ago
A) Strict liability because they should be held accountable for the harm caused.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel