Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS Exam PSP Topic 7 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 7
[All PSP Questions]

What applies to a provider of defective or hazardous products or services that unduly threaten a consumer's personal safety?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Virgina at Jun 21, 2024, 07:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tonette
1 months ago
Easy peasy, it's strict liability all the way. Unless, of course, you're a superhero with the ability to make everything safe. In that case, option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Dona
20 days ago
No, it's not the plaintiff, it's strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
21 days ago
B) Plaintiff
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
23 days ago
Definitely strict liability, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
27 days ago
A) Strict liability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Idella
2 months ago
Strict liability is the way to go. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the product manufacturing kitchen!
upvoted 0 times
Wilbert
28 days ago
Yeah, if you're putting out dangerous products, you should be held accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 months ago
Ah, the old 'who's to blame' game. I'm going with option A - strict liability. Gotta keep those consumers safe, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Caren
7 days ago
It's a good way to ensure consumer safety and hold companies accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
16 days ago
Definitely, the responsibility should fall on the provider in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
26 days ago
Yeah, it's important for consumers to be protected from defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
29 days ago
I agree, option A - strict liability makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
2 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the correct answer here. The provider is responsible for any harm caused by their defective or hazardous products, regardless of negligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
2 months ago
D) None of the above because sometimes accidents happen and it may not always be the provider's fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
2 months ago
C) Defendant because they are the ones being accused of providing defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
2 months ago
A) Strict liability because they should be held accountable for the harm caused.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel