Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS Exam PSP Topic 7 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 7
[All PSP Questions]

What applies to a provider of defective or hazardous products or services that unduly threaten a consumer's personal safety?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Virgina at Jun 21, 2024, 08:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tammi
4 days ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Is it asking about the party that is liable, or the legal standard that applies? I'll need to re-read it carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
8 days ago
I think option C is the most comprehensive description. It mentions the ISR 1000 has SD-WAN, security, and wired/wireless access, which sounds like a high-performance platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
12 days ago
The key here is understanding the OSPF roles and how they interact in a broadcast network. I'll review my notes on that to make sure I pick the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
17 days ago
Okay, let's see. If IsICP is enabled, that means the ICP account is being used for intercompany transactions, so the answer is likely C. The ICP account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
6 months ago
Easy peasy, it's strict liability all the way. Unless, of course, you're a superhero with the ability to make everything safe. In that case, option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Corrina
4 months ago
Well, unless you're a superhero, it's definitely strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
4 months ago
D) None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
4 months ago
Not the defendant, it's strict liability that applies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
4 months ago
C) Defendant
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
5 months ago
No, it's not the plaintiff, it's strict liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
5 months ago
B) Plaintiff
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
5 months ago
Definitely strict liability, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
5 months ago
A) Strict liability
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Idella
6 months ago
Strict liability is the way to go. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the product manufacturing kitchen!
upvoted 0 times
Wilbert
5 months ago
Yeah, if you're putting out dangerous products, you should be held accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
5 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
6 months ago
Ah, the old 'who's to blame' game. I'm going with option A - strict liability. Gotta keep those consumers safe, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Caren
4 months ago
It's a good way to ensure consumer safety and hold companies accountable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
Definitely, the responsibility should fall on the provider in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
5 months ago
Yeah, it's important for consumers to be protected from defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
5 months ago
I agree, option A - strict liability makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
6 months ago
Strict liability is definitely the correct answer here. The provider is responsible for any harm caused by their defective or hazardous products, regardless of negligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
6 months ago
D) None of the above because sometimes accidents happen and it may not always be the provider's fault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
6 months ago
C) Defendant because they are the ones being accused of providing defective products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
6 months ago
A) Strict liability because they should be held accountable for the harm caused.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel