In which approach of comparative negligence, the plaintiff may collect something for injuries even if he or she was primarily responsible for the injuries?
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to use the standard EDA features as the prompt suggests, so I'd go with option A to create an Affiliation mapping to the Primary Chapter field.
This question is making my head spin. I just want to collect my paycheck, not get into the nitty-gritty of comparative negligence. Can we move on to the next question, please?
The 51 percent rule seems like the right answer - the plaintiff can only collect if they were less than 51% responsible, right? That's what I'm going with.
I agree, the 51 percent rule is the approach where the plaintiff can still receive compensation as long as they were less than 51% responsible for the injuries.
Genevive
4 days agoCaprice
8 days agoCortney
5 months agoMonroe
5 months agoMammie
4 months agoAlbina
4 months agoLashandra
4 months agoWilliam
5 months agoFrancesco
5 months agoNgoc
4 months agoLettie
5 months agoEun
5 months agoLuisa
6 months agoSherita
6 months agoStacey
4 months agoFrancisca
4 months agoDeane
5 months agoMadalyn
5 months agoAlishia
6 months agoLuisa
6 months agoBrinda
6 months agoMalcom
6 months agoBrinda
6 months ago