New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS PSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 3
[All PSP Questions]

Businesses have been forced to come to terms with potential consequences of taking security risks and the solution which should be complementary is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Flo
3 months ago
A solid investment in loss prevention can save a lot in the long run!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
3 months ago
I disagree, neither A nor B really covers all risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
3 months ago
Surprised that people think loss prevention isn't crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I think insurance alone is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
4 months ago
Definitely both A and B are needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
4 months ago
I vaguely remember that some businesses prioritize one over the other, but I think both A and B together provide a stronger safety net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether investing in loss prevention alone is enough. I feel like insurance is also crucial, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
4 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I leaned towards option C because it makes sense to have both strategies in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
5 months ago
I remember discussing how both loss prevention techniques and insurance are important for managing risks, but I'm not sure if they should be seen as complementary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about the single best solution, or the complementary solution? I'll need to re-read it carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
5 months ago
I'm confident the answer is C. Businesses need a multi-faceted approach to security, including both proactive measures like loss prevention and reactive measures like insurance. Choosing just one wouldn't be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Is the question asking about the best single solution, or are both A and B considered complementary solutions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the answer is C - both investment in loss prevention techniques and insurance are complementary solutions for businesses dealing with security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Businesses need to address security risks, and the question is asking about the complementary solution. I'm leaning towards C, as both loss prevention and insurance seem like important pieces of the puzzle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different wireless modes and how they can be combined to bridge networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit risky today, so I'm going to go with D. Who needs security anyway? YOLO!
upvoted 0 times
Esteban
1 year ago
User3: I'm feeling a bit risky today, so I'm going to go with D. Who needs security anyway? YOLO!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
User2: I agree, but having insurance as a backup is also crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
1 year ago
I think it's important to invest in loss prevention techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
1 year ago
Clearly the answer is C. Businesses need to cover their assets, literally and figuratively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
C for sure. You can't have one without the other. It's like trying to drive a car without both a steering wheel and a spare tire.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
1 year ago
C) Both A and B
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 year ago
B) Insurance
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
1 year ago
A) Investment in loss prevention techniques
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carma
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm going with B. Insurance is the way to go. Who needs all that pesky loss prevention when you can just get covered?
upvoted 0 times
Joseph
1 year ago
I think I'll go with both A and B for maximum security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 year ago
True, a combination of both could provide the best protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
1 year ago
But investing in loss prevention techniques can also be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
1 year ago
I agree, insurance is definitely a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
1 year ago
I disagree with Dorinda, investing in loss prevention techniques is crucial to prevent security breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
1 year ago
I believe just having insurance is enough to mitigate security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
I agree with Felix, investing in loss prevention techniques and having insurance is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
2 years ago
D? Are you kidding me? Businesses can't just ignore security risks. They need a comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
Brynn
1 year ago
C) Both A and B
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
1 year ago
A) Investment in loss prevention techniques
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kina
2 years ago
I think the answer is C. Both loss prevention techniques and insurance are necessary to address security risks.
upvoted 0 times
Ivette
1 year ago
It's important for businesses to have a comprehensive approach to security to mitigate potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 year ago
Investing in loss prevention techniques can help prevent security breaches, while having insurance can provide financial protection in case of a breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
I agree, having both loss prevention techniques and insurance is crucial for addressing security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 years ago
I think the solution should be both A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel