Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ASIS Exam PSP Topic 6 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 6
[All PSP Questions]

What occurs when the person who committed the act was able to foresee that the action would result in certain damages?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Anthony
4 days ago
Okay, I think I've got this. If the person committing the act could foresee the resulting damages, that would likely point to a finding of liability. Let me double-check the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
13 days ago
The Safeguards Rule under GLBA sounds like the right answer to me. It requires companies to protect the security and confidentiality of consumer information, which seems to be the main issue Noah is concerned about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
16 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about some of these options. I'll need to carefully read through each one and think about how they apply to crosscutting concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
5 months ago
Wait, is the answer 'all of the above'? Kidding, kidding, but seriously, this question is making my head spin. Time for a coffee break!
upvoted 0 times
Shawnee
3 months ago
Let's go grab that coffee break now!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
3 months ago
Definitely, foreseeing certain damages sounds like it could be an international tort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
3 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most relevant option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) International tort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
3 months ago
D) None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
3 months ago
C) International tort
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
4 months ago
B) Lack of control
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
A) Active resister
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
5 months ago
Lack of control? Really? If they could foresee the damages, that sounds like the opposite of lack of control. I'm with Eloisa on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
5 months ago
Hmm, international tort? What, did they commit this crime across borders or something? Sounds like a wild option, I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Camellia
3 months ago
Definitely, let's stick with lack of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
3 months ago
I agree, lack of control seems like a more straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
3 months ago
Yeah, international tort does sound complicated. I think I'll go with lack of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
3 months ago
D) None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
3 months ago
C) International tort
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
4 months ago
B) Lack of control
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
A) Active resister
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenia
5 months ago
I'm gonna go with D. None of these options seem to fit the description. It's like a trick question or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
5 months ago
A? I mean, if they could foresee the damages, that sounds like an active decision to me. Gotta be A.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
4 months ago
Definitely A, it makes sense that they would be considered an active resister in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
4 months ago
Yeah, it seems like they had control over the situation if they could foresee the damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
4 months ago
I think it's A too. They actively chose to do something that they knew would cause harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luther
6 months ago
That makes sense, I see your point. Thanks for explaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) International tort because it involves foreseeability of damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) Active resister.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel