New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS PSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 3
[All PSP Questions]

Which of the following is NOT the distinct action that fall into invasion of privacy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Stefanie at Sep 10, 2024, 05:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheridan
3 months ago
Hmm, I always thought public facts could still be private.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
3 months ago
I thought all of these were invasions, but C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
4 months ago
Totally agree, C doesn't fit the definition!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
4 months ago
C is the right answer, it's not really an invasion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
4 months ago
I think intrusion into seclusion is a clear invasion, but I'm torn on whether private disclosure fits the definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
4 months ago
I feel like all of these actions are related to privacy, but I can't quite recall if private disclosure of public facts counts as an invasion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where false light was definitely considered an invasion. I wonder if that helps here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
5 months ago
I think I remember that misappropriation is definitely an invasion of privacy, but I'm not sure about the private disclosure of public facts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
I've got a good handle on the invasion of privacy torts, so I think I can figure this out. I'll just need to analyze each option and see which one doesn't match the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on the different types of invasion of privacy to determine which option doesn't fit. Gotta be careful with these legal concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The options cover misappropriation, false light, public disclosure, and intrusion. I'll need to consider how each of those relates to invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one doesn't fit the definition of invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the different types of invasion of privacy before I can decide which one is not a distinct action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if that's the best approach. Option C about deactivating the live app and importing the previous version seems like it might be a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording here. Is Inclusive gateway also an option, since that allows multiple branches to be triggered? Or is Exclusive the only one that fits the "according to the rules" part? Hmm, I'll have to review my BPMN knowledge on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
10 months ago
Oooh, this is a good one. I'm going to go with C - 'private disclosure of public facts'. It just doesn't seem to fit the other examples of invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
9 months ago
D) intrusion into the seclusion of another
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
B) placing the plaintiff in the false light
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
A) misappropriation of the plaintiff's name or picture for commercial advantage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roselle
10 months ago
Haha, I hope the correct answer isn't 'intrusion into the seclusion of another' - that would be a real invasion of privacy! But I think C is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
11 months ago
I think the answer is C - 'private disclosure of public facts'. That doesn't really fit the definition of invasion of privacy, unlike the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Cruz
9 months ago
Definitely, C seems out of place when it comes to invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
9 months ago
Yeah, C doesn't really fit the definition compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
9 months ago
I agree, C doesn't seem like a distinct action that falls into invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
9 months ago
Yeah, C seems out of place compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
D) intrusion into the seclusion of another
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
10 months ago
C) private disclosure of public facts
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
10 months ago
I agree, C doesn't make sense. It's about public facts, not private ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
10 months ago
B) placing the plaintiff in the false light
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
10 months ago
A) misappropriation of the plaintiff's name or picture for commercial advantage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miriam
11 months ago
Actually, I remember studying that the correct answer is C) private disclosure of public facts because it involves sharing true information that is not private.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B) placing the plaintiff in the false light.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I guess 'private disclosure of public facts' would not be considered an invasion of privacy since the information is already public, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) private disclosure of public facts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel