New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ASIS PSP Exam - Topic 2 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for ASIS's PSP exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 2
[All PSP Questions]

Which of the following is Correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Marsha at Jan 27, 2025, 12:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nadine
3 months ago
C? Really? That doesn't make sense at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
3 months ago
B sounds wrong, it should be less than 50%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
Wait, isn't it 51%? This seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
4 months ago
A is correct, plaintiff needs to be under 50%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
4 months ago
I’m confused because D sounds like it could be correct too, but I remember the threshold is about being under 50 percent. I guess I’ll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about how the plaintiff's fault affects their ability to collect. A seems to fit that concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about the plaintiff needing to be less than 50 percent responsible. That makes A sound right, but I could be mixing it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
5 months ago
I think the 51 percent rule means the plaintiff can’t be more than 50 percent at fault to recover damages, so I’m leaning towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
5 months ago
The key is understanding that the plaintiff's contribution has to be less than 51 percent, not 50 percent. I'll select B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
5 months ago
Wait, is it the plaintiff's contribution that has to be less than 50 percent, or more than 50 percent? I'm not totally sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
5 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the 51 percent rule now. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Let me re-read it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of the 51% rule. It's like trying to walk a tightrope blindfolded while juggling chainsaws. Good luck, everyone!
upvoted 0 times
Lucina
9 months ago
C) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must not have contributed less than 48 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
B) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must not have contributed less than 49 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
9 months ago
A) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must have contributed less than 50 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melita
10 months ago
Wait, so the plaintiff has to be less than 50% responsible, but not 49% or more? Sounds like a real legal minefield to me!
upvoted 0 times
Bok
9 months ago
User 3: User Comment: Wait, so the plaintiff has to be less than 50% responsible, but not 49% or more? Sounds like a real legal minefield to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
9 months ago
User 2: B) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must not have contributed less than 49 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
10 months ago
User 1: A) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must have contributed less than 50 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
10 months ago
This question is a piece of cake! Option A is clearly the correct answer. I can't believe anyone would get this wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
10 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. After all, the 51% rule means the plaintiff can't have contributed more than 51% of the situation, right?
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
9 months ago
User 4: Exactly, option D is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
User 3: So, the plaintiff's acts must not have contributed less than 51% to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. The plaintiff can't have contributed more than 51%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
10 months ago
User 1: I think option D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josephine
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's option B. The plaintiff's acts must not have contributed 49% or more of the situation to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
10 months ago
But in the 51 percent rule, the plaintiff's acts must contribute less than 50 percent, so A makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
11 months ago
Option A is correct. The plaintiff's acts must have contributed less than 50% of the situation in order to collect damages under the 51% rule of comparative negligence.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
9 months ago
Option A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
A) in 51 percent rule of comparative negligence, the plaintiff's acts must have contributed less than 50 percent of the situation in order to collect damages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel