The Service Perimeter Guard pattern has been applied to help avoid denial of service attacks for a service inventory. As a result, services within the service inventory are only accessible via a perimeter service However, denial of service attacks continue to succeed and services within the service inventory become unavailable to external service consumers. What is the likely cause of this?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium S90.19 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
8 comments · newest first
DO
Dorian
12 months ago
Not sure about C, seems like overkill for this scenario.
RA
Raylene
12 months ago
A combination of patterns is usually better for security.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Wait, are we saying the guard doesn't help at all? That's surprising!
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
I think B makes the most sense here.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
The perimeter service can totally get hit by DoS attacks.
SH
Sherill
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The passage talks about recognizing assets and liabilities, so I'm wondering if the accrual basis might be the right answer. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I know the answer, but I'll double-check the details just to be sure.
HO
Howard
1 year ago
This seems like a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of Azure services. I'm pretty confident that Azure Information Protection is the right answer here, as it's designed for data classification and protection.