MENU
SAML assertions are smaller than certificates and they do not require access to any remote system for verification purposes.
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium S90.19 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
9 comments · newest first
KA
Kathrine
12 months ago
I thought they still needed some form of verification though?
YU
Yuette
12 months ago
Yup, that’s correct! Lightweight and efficient.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
TI
Titus
1 year ago
Totally agree, they don’t need remote verification!
CE
Celestina
1 year ago
SAML assertions are indeed smaller than certificates.
HE
Hermila
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know project versions can be changed, so that's one for sure. But I'm not sure about the other options - I'll have to think this through.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I think structs are really useful for defining new data types, but I'm not entirely sure if they replace objects from other contracts, like option A suggests.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions addressing adoption barriers, so I'm wondering if that could mean the customer is in the Adoption stage. I'll have to think this through carefully.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to focus on the prerequisites for integrating Cisco ISE with an AD domain.