Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.19 Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

SAML assertions are smaller than certificates and they do not require access to any remote system for verification purposes.
B) False
A) True

Arcitura Education S90.19 Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.19 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All S90.19 Questions]

SAML assertions are smaller than certificates and they do not require access to any remote system for verification purposes.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Roslyn at May 10, 2022, 03:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.19 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kathrine
10 months ago
I thought they still needed some form of verification though?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
10 months ago
Yup, that’s correct! Lightweight and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
11 months ago
Totally agree, they don’t need remote verification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
11 months ago
SAML assertions are indeed smaller than certificates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know project versions can be changed, so that's one for sure. But I'm not sure about the other options - I'll have to think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
11 months ago
I think structs are really useful for defining new data types, but I'm not entirely sure if they replace objects from other contracts, like option A suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions addressing adoption barriers, so I'm wondering if that could mean the customer is in the Adoption stage. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to focus on the prerequisites for integrating Cisco ISE with an AD domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel