Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.18 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

XML canonicalization is the process of standardizing the syntax of XML documents that are to be digitally signed. This way, when the digital signature is verified, it reproduces the same message digest for assessing message integrity.
A) True
B) False

Arcitura Education S90.18 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.18 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All S90.18 Questions]

XML canonicalization is the process of standardizing the syntax of XML documents that are to be digitally signed. This way, when the digital signature is verified, it reproduces the same message digest for assessing message integrity.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Derrick at Sep 15, 2024, 02:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.18 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eura
9 months ago
It's surprising how many people overlook this process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
9 months ago
False, I don't think that's how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
10 months ago
Wait, I thought XML was just for data representation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
10 months ago
Totally agree, it ensures message integrity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
That's true, canonicalization is key for XML signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I believe the statement is true because it helps ensure message integrity, but I need to double-check my notes on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
11 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up canonicalization with something else. Is it really just about standardizing syntax?
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question about XML and signatures, and I think the answer is true.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
I think XML canonicalization is important for digital signatures, but I'm not completely sure if it's always necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not 100% sure about this. I'll need to review my notes on XML security to make sure I fully understand the purpose and importance of canonicalization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
I'm confident this is a true statement. Canonicalization is a crucial step in the digital signing process for XML documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
11 months ago
Okay, I think I get it now. The key is that canonicalization standardizes the XML syntax so the digital signature can be properly verified, even if the original XML had some minor formatting differences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the purpose of XML canonicalization. Is it just to ensure the same message digest is generated, or is there more to it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
11 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. XML canonicalization is used to standardize the syntax of XML documents before digital signing, so the signature can be verified correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
No access required? That sounds too easy. I'll narrow it down to A or B and think about the access levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
2 years ago
True, true, true! This is XML 101. If you don't know this, you might as well give up and become a basket weaver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 years ago
True, of course! Who would ever sign an uncanonical XML document? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
2 years ago
Exactly, signing an uncanonical XML document would defeat the purpose of digital signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
2 years ago
False? I'm not sure, this seems like a tricky question. Hmm, better read up on XML canonicalization again.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
2 years ago
I'm not sure either, let's look it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
2 years ago
I think it's true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
2 years ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
2 years ago
Definitely True. This is a crucial step in maintaining the integrity of signed XML documents.
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
2 years ago
Absolutely, it's important for ensuring the integrity of digitally signed XML documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thurman
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is True because it helps ensure message integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
2 years ago
I think the answer is True. Canonicalization ensures consistent representation of XML documents for digital signing.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
2 years ago
Great job! You got it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 years ago
That's correct. XML canonicalization is indeed used to standardize XML documents for digital signing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 years ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
2 years ago
I agree with Lorean, XML canonicalization is important for digital signatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 years ago
I think the statement is true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel