Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 3

Identify what is wrong with this statement: "SOAP-based Web services A and B are participating in a runtime transaction that is carried out as per the WS-AtomicTransaction standard. When a message sent by Service A is rejected by Service B due to a violation of a WS-Policy definition expressed as part of the Service B contract, Service A is forced to issue an Abort message, thereby requiring the transaction to be rolled back.'' Select the correct answer.

AWS-AtomicTransaction does not support the rollback of changes that occur during runtime transactions.

BWS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.

CSOAP-based Web services cannot have policies and cannot participate in runtime transactions because they are limited to the use of a uniform service contract.

DThere is nothing wrong with this statement.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Rossana at Jan 15, 2025, 04:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ronnie

3 months ago

Definitely option B, policies are separate from the contract!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

3 months ago

I think option A is misleading; rollback is supported in WS-AtomicTransaction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Irma

3 months ago

Wait, can SOAP services really not have policies? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marica

4 months ago

I agree, option B is the correct answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

4 months ago

WS-Policy is part of the service contract, so that's not right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards option D because the statement seems accurate to me, but I could be missing something.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nguyet

4 months ago

This question feels familiar; I think SOAP services can have policies, which makes option C seem wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think WS-Policy can be part of the service contract, so maybe option B is the right choice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivory

5 months ago

I remember that WS-AtomicTransaction does allow for rollback, so I think option A is incorrect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

5 months ago

The statement seems to be mixing up some key details about SOAP, WS-Policy, and WS-AtomicTransaction. I'll need to carefully analyze each part of the statement to identify the specific issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the details in this question. I'll need to review my notes on SOAP-based web services and transaction management standards to make sure I understand the concepts properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melda

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The statement says that when a message is rejected due to a WS-Policy violation, the transaction has to be rolled back. But I'm pretty sure WS-AtomicTransaction doesn't support rollbacks, so that part must be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

5 months ago

The part about WS-Policy definitions being expressed as part of the service contract seems questionable to me. I'll need to double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorian

5 months ago

Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'll need to carefully review the details about WS-AtomicTransaction and WS-Policy to figure out what's wrong with the statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

9 months ago

Rollback a transaction due to a policy violation? That's gotta hurt. Good thing B is the correct answer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeannetta

9 months ago

D? Really? This statement is all kinds of wrong. I'm going with B, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Maile

8 months ago

B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

8 months ago

Definitely not D, that statement has multiple issues. B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryanne

8 months ago

I agree, B seems to be the most accurate choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

9 months ago

I think B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jess

10 months ago

Ha! 'Forced to issue an Abort message'? That sounds like a bad day at the office. I'll go with B on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Stephen

8 months ago

User 3: Definitely, WS-Policy definitions are expressed as part of the service contract.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmad

9 months ago

User 2: I agree, I think B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

9 months ago

User 1: Yeah, 'Abort message' doesn't sound good.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deangelo

10 months ago

Hold up, C can't be right. SOAP-based Web services can definitely have policies and participate in runtime transactions. This statement is just confusing.

upvoted 0 times