MENU
Identify what is wrong with this statement: "SOAP-based Web services A and B are participating in a runtime transaction that is carried out as per the WS-AtomicTransaction standard. When a message sent by Service A is rejected by Service B due to a violation of a WS-Policy definition expressed as part of the Service B contract, Service A is forced to issue an Abort message, thereby requiring the transaction to be rolled back.'' Select the correct answer.
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium S90.02 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
RO
Ronnie
11 months ago
Definitely option B, policies are separate from the contract!
CR
Cristal
11 months ago
I think option A is misleading; rollback is supported in WS-AtomicTransaction.
IR
Irma
11 months ago
Wait, can SOAP services really not have policies? That seems off.
MA
Marica
11 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer here.
DE
Dean
12 months ago
WS-Policy is part of the service contract, so that's not right.
HE
Hershel
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because the statement seems accurate to me, but I could be missing something.
NG
Nguyet
1 year ago
This question feels familiar; I think SOAP services can have policies, which makes option C seem wrong.
JO
Jordan
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think WS-Policy can be part of the service contract, so maybe option B is the right choice?
IV
Ivory
1 year ago
I remember that WS-AtomicTransaction does allow for rollback, so I think option A is incorrect.
BR
Brittni
1 year ago
The statement seems to be mixing up some key details about SOAP, WS-Policy, and WS-AtomicTransaction. I'll need to carefully analyze each part of the statement to identify the specific issue.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the details in this question. I'll need to review my notes on SOAP-based web services and transaction management standards to make sure I understand the concepts properly.
ME
Melda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The statement says that when a message is rejected due to a WS-Policy violation, the transaction has to be rolled back. But I'm pretty sure WS-AtomicTransaction doesn't support rollbacks, so that part must be wrong.
ME
Melissia
1 year ago
The part about WS-Policy definitions being expressed as part of the service contract seems questionable to me. I'll need to double-check that.
DO
Dorian
1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'll need to carefully review the details about WS-AtomicTransaction and WS-Policy to figure out what's wrong with the statement.
FR
Frankie
1 year ago
Rollback a transaction due to a policy violation? That's gotta hurt. Good thing B is the correct answer!
JE
Jeannetta
1 year ago
D? Really? This statement is all kinds of wrong. I'm going with B, no doubt about it.
MA
Maile
1 year ago
B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
Definitely not D, that statement has multiple issues. B is the way to go.
MA
Maryanne
1 year ago
I agree, B seems to be the most accurate choice.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
JE
Jess
1 year ago
Ha! 'Forced to issue an Abort message'? That sounds like a bad day at the office. I'll go with B on this one.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, WS-Policy definitions are expressed as part of the service contract.
AH
Ahmad
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, I think B is the correct answer.
KA
Katie
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, 'Abort message' doesn't sound good.
DE
Deangelo
1 year ago
Hold up, C can't be right. SOAP-based Web services can definitely have policies and participate in runtime transactions. This statement is just confusing.
SA
Santos
1 year ago
User 3: D) There is nothing wrong with this statement.
RO
Rose
1 year ago
User 2: B) WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
CH
Chantay
1 year ago
User 1: A) WS-AtomicTransaction does not support the rollback of changes that occur during runtime transactions.
SA
Sanjuana
2 years ago
Hmm, this statement seems a bit off. I think the correct answer is B - WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
HE
Henriette
1 year ago
That's correct, the statement does have that mistake.
ZI
Zita
1 year ago
I agree, WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
SA
Samuel
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the correct answer is D.
AR
Argelia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
NO
Nohemi
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is A.