Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Identify what is wrong with this statement: "SOAP-based Web services A and B are participating in a runtime transaction that is carried out as per the WS-AtomicTransaction standard. When a message sent by Service A is rejected by Service B due to a violation of a WS-Policy definition expressed as part of the Service B contract, Service A is forced to issue an Abort message, thereby requiring the transaction to be rolled back.'' Select the correct answer.
D) There is nothing wrong with this statement.
A) WS-AtomicTransaction does not support the rollback of changes that occur during runtime transactions.
B) WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
C) SOAP-based Web services cannot have policies and cannot participate in runtime transactions because they are limited to the use of a uniform service contract.

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 3 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 3
[All S90.02 Questions]

Identify what is wrong with this statement: "SOAP-based Web services A and B are participating in a runtime transaction that is carried out as per the WS-AtomicTransaction standard. When a message sent by Service A is rejected by Service B due to a violation of a WS-Policy definition expressed as part of the Service B contract, Service A is forced to issue an Abort message, thereby requiring the transaction to be rolled back.'' Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Rossana at Jan 15, 2025, 04:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ronnie
8 months ago
Definitely option B, policies are separate from the contract!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
8 months ago
I think option A is misleading; rollback is supported in WS-AtomicTransaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
8 months ago
Wait, can SOAP services really not have policies? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
8 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
9 months ago
WS-Policy is part of the service contract, so that's not right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because the statement seems accurate to me, but I could be missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
9 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think SOAP services can have policies, which makes option C seem wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think WS-Policy can be part of the service contract, so maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
9 months ago
I remember that WS-AtomicTransaction does allow for rollback, so I think option A is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
The statement seems to be mixing up some key details about SOAP, WS-Policy, and WS-AtomicTransaction. I'll need to carefully analyze each part of the statement to identify the specific issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the details in this question. I'll need to review my notes on SOAP-based web services and transaction management standards to make sure I understand the concepts properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The statement says that when a message is rejected due to a WS-Policy violation, the transaction has to be rolled back. But I'm pretty sure WS-AtomicTransaction doesn't support rollbacks, so that part must be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
9 months ago
The part about WS-Policy definitions being expressed as part of the service contract seems questionable to me. I'll need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
10 months ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'll need to carefully review the details about WS-AtomicTransaction and WS-Policy to figure out what's wrong with the statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
1 year ago
Rollback a transaction due to a policy violation? That's gotta hurt. Good thing B is the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 year ago
D? Really? This statement is all kinds of wrong. I'm going with B, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
1 year ago
B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
Definitely not D, that statement has multiple issues. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
I agree, B seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jess
1 year ago
Ha! 'Forced to issue an Abort message'? That sounds like a bad day at the office. I'll go with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, WS-Policy definitions are expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, 'Abort message' doesn't sound good.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deangelo
1 year ago
Hold up, C can't be right. SOAP-based Web services can definitely have policies and participate in runtime transactions. This statement is just confusing.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
1 year ago
User 3: D) There is nothing wrong with this statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
1 year ago
User 2: B) WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 year ago
User 1: A) WS-AtomicTransaction does not support the rollback of changes that occur during runtime transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanjuana
1 year ago
Hmm, this statement seems a bit off. I think the correct answer is B - WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
Henriette
1 year ago
That's correct, the statement does have that mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 year ago
I agree, WS-Policy definitions are not expressed as part of the service contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samuel
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel