New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Arcitura Education S90.02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Arcitura Education's S90.02 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 1
[All S90.02 Questions]

Using WS-AtomicTransaction you wrap 3 SOAP-based Web services in a single transaction. When it is time to vote on the outcome of the transaction, 2 of the services vote to commit the changes made during the transaction, but a vote from the third service is not received. What will happen? Select the correct answer.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Belen at Feb 08, 2025, 06:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium S90.02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leatha
3 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, it’s pretty straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
No way, it has to be more than 2 commits to succeed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
3 months ago
Wait, I thought one commit was enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Totally agree, can't commit without all votes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
B is the right answer. Missing vote means rollback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that for a transaction to be successful, you need a majority of Commit votes. So, option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought as long as there was one Commit vote, it would be fine. But now I’m not so sure if that applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
4 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the consensus was that a missing vote means the transaction fails. So, I’m leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I remember studying that in WS-AtomicTransaction, if there's a missing vote, it usually leads to a rollback, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know WS-AtomicTransaction is designed to ensure consistency, but I'm not certain how it handles a scenario like this with a missing vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since two of the services voted to commit, and there was no abort vote, the transaction should be considered successful, even with the missing vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the details of the WS-AtomicTransaction specification to understand the correct behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the WS-AtomicTransaction protocol and how it handles missing votes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
12 months ago
Haha, imagine if the third service was just out to lunch and forgot to vote. What a way to ruin the whole transaction!
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
11 months ago
User 3: B) The changes are rolled back because the transaction is considered unsuccessful when there is a missing vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
11 months ago
User 2: A) The changes are committed because the transaction is considered successful as long as no Abort votes are received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
11 months ago
User 1: That would be a disaster if the third service forgot to vote!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherron
1 year ago
D sounds a bit too strict. Isn't it enough to have a majority of Commit votes?
upvoted 0 times
Tandra
11 months ago
D sounds too strict. I think it should be enough to have a majority of Commit votes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
11 months ago
A) The changes are committed because the transaction is considered successful as long as no Abort votes are received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
C seems plausible, but I'm not sure that's how WS-AtomicTransaction works. Gotta study up on that.
upvoted 0 times
Broderick
11 months ago
I believe it depends on the specific implementation of WS-AtomicTransaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
12 months ago
I think C is correct, but I'm not entirely sure either.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serina
1 year ago
That's an interesting perspective, but I still think the changes will be rolled back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
Hmm, I think B is the correct answer. If one of the services doesn't vote, the transaction can't be considered successful.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
11 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. A transaction can only be successful if more than 2 Commit votes are received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C might be the correct answer. As long as one Commit vote is received, the changes will be committed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe B is the correct answer. If there is a missing vote, the changes will be rolled back.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
1 year ago
I think A is the correct answer. As long as no Abort votes are received, the changes will be committed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the changes will be committed as long as no Abort votes are received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
I think the changes will be rolled back because of the missing vote.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel