I'm a little confused by this question. All of these options seem like they could be APSE guidelines, to be honest. I'll have to review the material again to make sure I understand what's considered ethical or not under their standards. Hmm, this is a tricky one.
Okay, let's see here. I know the APSE guidelines focus on things like job supports and respecting the individual. I'm leaning towards C as the answer, since saying individuals with severe disabilities are unemployable would go against their principles. But I'm not 100% sure.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The APSE guidelines are all about supporting individuals with disabilities, so I'm not sure if any of these options would actually be considered unethical. I'll have to think this through carefully.
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is C - individuals with severe disabilities being unemployable, since that goes against the APSE principles of self-determination and respect for the individual.
I agree, respecting individuals with severe disabilities and providing them with opportunities for employment is important for promoting equality and independence.
C) Individuals with severe disabilities being unemployable? That's just plain wrong! We've come a long way in supporting people with all abilities to find meaningful work.
Katlyn
7 months agoFallon
8 months agoBea
8 months agoTrina
8 months agoReid
8 months agoLachelle
9 months agoTrinidad
9 months agoLelia
9 months agoLudivina
9 months agoCassandra
9 months agoDean
9 months agoTula
9 months agoTroy
9 months agoVeronique
9 months agoRefugia
1 year agoFidelia
1 year agoMohammad
1 year agoAlise
1 year agoGlen
1 year agoAretha
1 year agoNadine
1 year agoTammara
1 year agoLavonna
1 year agoLai
1 year agoOllie
1 year agoTy
1 year agoPamella
1 year agoAudrie
1 year agoFreeman
1 year agoMeghan
1 year agoAvery
1 year agoKris
1 year agoDulce
1 year agoLynelle
1 year agoLezlie
1 year agoLorita
1 year agoNatalie
1 year agoAvery
1 year ago