New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

APSE CESP Exam - Topic 1 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for APSE's CESP exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 1
[All CESP Questions]

You receive a referral for supported employment services for an individual whom your program worked with in the past. When previously served, this individual was minimally engaged and had difficulty with follow through. Which of the following is the MOST appropriate way to proceed with this individual?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mickie
3 months ago
I don’t think referring him elsewhere will help. He needs support, not a new start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
Option A might be better. Assessing readiness first makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
3 months ago
Really? I’m not sure he’ll follow through even if you meet with him.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
Totally agree! He needs to feel involved this time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Engaging him is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
4 months ago
I keep going back and forth on this. Option A seems safe, but I wonder if it really addresses his past issues with follow-through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where engagement was key. I think meeting with him first, like in option C, could help build rapport.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like setting conditions in option B could be too strict. It might push him away again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of engagement in previous sessions. I think option C might be the best choice since it focuses on his interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
5 months ago
Referring him to another program might be the easiest solution, but I'm not sure that's the most helpful approach. We should at least try to work with him again before giving up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
I think the best option is to meet with him and try to re-engage him. We've worked with him before, so we should use that history to our advantage and see if we can get him more motivated this time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Should we really be setting conditions for him to prove he'll follow through? That doesn't seem very client-centered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
5 months ago
Meeting with him to discuss his interests and getting him involved in the job development process seems like the most appropriate approach here. We should try to build on the relationship we already have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should go with the prevocational program or try to engage him directly. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option A to bind the user identity to the specific Pub/Sub roles at the resource level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to think through the different operations an eLER can perform on labeled packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
I think the key here is that Cisco Discovery Protocol is the only supported discovery protocol. If that's not working, then the policies won't be downloaded, right? I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 years ago
I believe referring him to a prevocational program could assess his readiness for services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
2 years ago
But what if he doesn't follow through again? Should we set up conditions for him to meet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
2 years ago
I agree with Gail. Engaging him in the job development process might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 years ago
I think we should meet with him and discuss his employment interests.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel