Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD201 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Valentin on Jul 02, 2026 at 03:42 AM

You're creating a point-of-sale (POS) system for a customer which can associate the items in a transaction to a customer based on a membership number. The item stock table and the customer sales record are hosted elsewhere and need to be written to via POST APIs from an Appian process model. This all occurs within a transaction process model that you're creating.

Which two steps should you perform to design your process model to improve process memory? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: B, D

Creating the POST API calls as asynchronous subprocesses allows them to run independently, reducing memory usage in the main process.

Adding a terminate process node at the end ensures the process completes and releases memory as soon as its work is finished.


Get Premium ACD201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
RO
Roy 2 days ago
But A might not directly improve memory usage like B does.
LI
Lilli 7 days ago
I’m leaning towards A too. Activity-chaining helps with clarity.
TR
Trinidad 12 days ago
Agreed! It allows the main process to continue without waiting.
OW
Owen 17 days ago
I think B is the best choice. Asynchronous subprocesses save memory.
KA
Katy 23 days ago
Let’s go with B and A then!
SH
Shala 28 days ago
Exactly! B and A seem like the safest options.
GL
Gladis 1 month ago
C could be risky. Synchronous might block the process.
KA
Katy 1 month ago
Right, but we need to know when it’s done.
SH
Shala 1 month ago
True, but it might slow things down a bit.
GL
Gladis 2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A too. Activity-chaining helps track progress.
KA
Katy 2 months ago
Agreed! It allows the main process to continue without waiting.
SH
Shala 2 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Asynchronous subprocesses can save memory.
DE
Delfina 2 months ago
Surprised there's no mention of error handling in the options!
RA
Ramonita 2 months ago
Definitely going with B, makes sense for memory efficiency.
FR
Freeman 2 months ago
Wait, why would you choose synchronous over asynchronous?
VI
Virgie 3 months ago
I think A is important for user experience too!
DE
Denny 3 months ago
B and C are both good options for handling APIs.
HA
Hana 3 months ago
I don’t think adding a terminate process node is relevant here. It seems like we should focus on how the APIs interact instead.
GA
Gary 3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the activity-chaining part. Does that really help with process memory, or is it more about user experience?
CA
Cassi 3 months ago
I remember a similar question where we discussed the benefits of synchronous vs asynchronous calls. I feel like asynchronous might be the way to go here.
RO
Roselle 4 months ago
I think we should consider using asynchronous subprocesses for the POST APIs to improve memory, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel