Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Application users are seeing long wait times between two forms they need to complete for a case.While reviewing the process model, you identify that activity chaining has been used throughout the process model, including unattended nodes.Which three actions can you take to make the process model more efficient? (Choose three.)
B) Shorten long process chains by combining transactions into the smallest number of nodes. and C) Avoid chaining system nodes like Integrations. and D) Move transactions that can be done asynchronously outside of the chain.
A) Use MNI for unattended nodes and chain where possible.
E) Reduce the number of swim lanes.

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 9 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 9
[All ACD200 Questions]

Application users are seeing long wait times between two forms they need to complete for a case.

While reviewing the process model, you identify that activity chaining has been used throughout the process model, including unattended nodes.

Which three actions can you take to make the process model more efficient? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Hubert at Aug 25, 2024, 02:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Luisa
9 months ago
Reducing swim lanes (E) could help streamline things too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
9 months ago
Wait, can we really move transactions out of the chain? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
9 months ago
C sounds right, chaining system nodes can cause delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
I think B makes sense, shorter chains are easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
10 months ago
A is definitely a good move for unattended nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
10 months ago
Moving transactions that can be done asynchronously outside of the chain sounds familiar; I feel like we practiced a similar question in our last review session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
Avoiding chaining system nodes like Integrations seems like a good idea, but I can't recall the exact reasons we learned for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
10 months ago
I think combining transactions into fewer nodes could help, but I wonder if that might complicate the process too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
11 months ago
I remember we discussed MNI in class, but I'm not entirely sure how it applies to unattended nodes here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll choose A, C, and D to address the chaining and unattended node problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
11 months ago
I've got a good handle on this. I'll go with A, B, and D to make the process more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the concept of "activity chaining." I'll need to refresh my memory on that before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. Activity chaining and unattended nodes are the key issues here. I think I'll focus on options B and D to start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the process model to identify any areas for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can someone clarify what exactly we're trying to resolve with the eligibility assessment tool? That might help me figure out the right commands to run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
2 years ago
Ugh, activity chaining - the bane of every process engineer's existence. But hey, at least we can have a laugh about it, right? B and D for the win, and maybe a little MNI (A) for good measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
2 years ago
I'm just imagining the dev team trying to untangle this spaghetti of a process model. B and D all the way - let's keep it simple and efficient, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 years ago
Hmm, C is a bit of a head-scratcher. Why would we avoid chaining system nodes? Seems counterintuitive to me. But B and D are solid choices for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 years ago
B and D seem like the obvious choices here. Shortening those long chains and moving asynchronous transactions out of the way - that's the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
2 years ago
Reducing the number of swim lanes can also help streamline the process model and improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
2 years ago
Using MNI for unattended nodes and avoiding chaining system nodes like Integrations are also important steps to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
2 years ago
I agree, shortening long process chains and moving asynchronous transactions outside of the chain will definitely help reduce wait times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 years ago
B and D are definitely key actions to take to improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
Ugh, activity chaining is the bane of my existence. I'd definitely go with B and D to streamline this process. And maybe throw in a little MNI for good measure (A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 years ago
I think we should also move transactions that can be done asynchronously outside of the chain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 years ago
I agree with Catherin, that sounds like a good way to make the process more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 years ago
I think we should use MNI for unattended nodes and chain where possible.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel