Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Appian Exam Appian Certified Senior Developer Topic 5 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's Appian Certified Senior Developer exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 5
[All Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions]

There is a need to relate two entities in the data structure: Employee and Skill.

Employees can have multiple skills, and a single skill can relate to multiple employees.

What kind of relationship would these entities have, and what is the minimum number of tables required to implement the design, according to Appian best practices? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Josefa at Jan 15, 2025, 10:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Appian Certified Senior Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Miss
2 months ago
Option B all the way! It's the most efficient way to handle this scenario. Plus, who needs more than 2 tables anyway? One-stop shopping, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Augustine
25 days ago
Definitely! Who needs more than 2 tables anyway? Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
26 days ago
Agreed! It's the most efficient way to handle the scenario with Employee and Skill entities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Many-to-many relationship with 2 tables is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meghann
2 months ago
Wow, this is a classic database design question. I'm confident option B is the right answer. Gotta love those many-to-many relationships!
upvoted 0 times
Elden
21 days ago
Definitely, having a clear understanding of the relationship helps in structuring the data effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
26 days ago
I agree, it's important to properly model the relationship between entities in the database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
28 days ago
Yeah, it makes sense to have 2 tables for a many-to-many relationship between employees and skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
30 days ago
I think option B is correct too. Many-to-many relationships are common in database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audria
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer is trying to trick us with these options. But I'm going with B, it's the simplest and most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Mila
1 months ago
User1: Definitely, keeping it simple with just 2 tables is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. It's the most efficient way to represent the relationship between employees and skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
2 months ago
User1: I think B is the answer too, it makes sense for multiple skills and employees to be connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerardo
3 months ago
I think option D is the best answer. A many-to-many relationship requires 3 tables to properly implement it.
upvoted 0 times
Zana
2 months ago
Yes, you are correct. Option D is the best answer for a many-to-many relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
3 months ago
I agree, option D is correct. Many-to-many relationships typically require 3 tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
3 months ago
The relationship between Employee and Skill is many-to-many, so option B is the correct answer. We need 2 tables to implement this design according to Appian best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
3 months ago
But wouldn't we need 3 tables for many-to-many relationship?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
3 months ago
I agree with Rikki, many-to-many makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
I think the relationship would be many-to-many.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel