Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 5 Question 20 Discussion

Posted by Kayleigh on Dec 11, 2023 at 02:03 PM

Which two practices are strongly discouraged for activity chaining? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: B, C

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
JU
Junita 11 months ago
Why is less than 5 seconds a bad thing? That’s surprising!
TE
Terrilyn 11 months ago
Agreed, A and C are the right choices!
SH
Shawnna 11 months ago
Wait, are we really discouraging less than 5 seconds? Seems odd.
BR
Brandon 11 months ago
I thought B was a problem too?
LI
Linwood 11 months ago
Definitely A and C! Those are big no-nos.
NO
Noah 12 months ago
I’m really unsure, but I feel like both A and C might be discouraged. I need to double-check my notes!
WY
Wynell 12 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think it was about limiting the number of node instances. Could it be A and B?
LO
Louisa 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like having more than 50 node instances is a bad practice. So maybe B and C?
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
I think I remember something about the time between activities being important. Maybe it's C and A?
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
Ah, I see now. Less than or equal to 5 seconds between activities and more than 50 node instances are the two practices that are strongly discouraged. Got it!
LO
Loren 1 year ago
I remember reading that more than 50 node instances is discouraged for activity chaining. And I think the ideal time between activities is more than 5 seconds. Let me double-check that.
NA
Nakita 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure less than 5 seconds between activities is recommended, so that's not a bad practice. But I'm not sure about the node instance limit.
GE
Georgene 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the best practices for activity chaining.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
Avoiding remote control seems like a good idea, as that could add an extra layer of complexity. I'll make sure to communicate clearly and patiently.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Hosting sounds like it could be the right answer too. I'll have to think it through carefully.
CE
Celeste 1 year ago
Looks like they're trying to keep those activities on a short leash!
JO
Johana 1 year ago
Activity chaining? More like 'activity conga line'!
CA
Casie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johana
C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities
CI
Ciara 1 year ago
↳ replying to Johana
A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.
KI
Kimbery 1 year ago
Less than or equal to 50 node instances? Phew, I was worried they'd make us use a supercomputer for this!
EZ
Ezekiel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
I know right! I was relieved when I saw that too.
DE
Desiree 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances
BE
Beckie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimbery
A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.
WI
Willard 1 year ago
50 node instances? That's a lot! I wonder if they'll let me use my abacus to keep track of all that.
RE
Reena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willard
C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities
SH
Shaniqua 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willard
B) More than 50 node instances
JE
Jerry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Willard
A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.
DO
Dorthy 1 year ago
Ah, so more than 5 seconds is discouraged? I guess they want us to keep those activities tightly chained together.
SO
Sophia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dorthy
D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances
ME
Merlyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dorthy
Yes, they want the activities to be closely linked.
HA
Haydee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dorthy
C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dorthy
A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.
HE
Herman 1 year ago
But having more than 50 node instances can lead to performance issues, so I think B is one of the correct answers.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's B and D that are discouraged.
HE
Herman 1 year ago
I think A and C are strongly discouraged for activity chaining.
DE
Demetra 2 years ago
Hmm, I thought less than 5 seconds between activities was a good thing for activity chaining. Looks like I need to review that one.
RA
Raymon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Demetra
B) More than 50 node instances
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
↳ replying to Demetra
A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel