Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 5 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 5

[All ACD200 Questions]

Which two practices are strongly discouraged for activity chaining? (Choose two.)

ALess than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

BMore than 50 node instances

CMore than 5 seconds between attended activities

DLess than or equal to 50 node instances

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Kayleigh at Dec 11, 2023, 02:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Junita

9 months ago

Why is less than 5 seconds a bad thing? That’s surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

9 months ago

Agreed, A and C are the right choices!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnna

10 months ago

Wait, are we really discouraging less than 5 seconds? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

10 months ago

I thought B was a problem too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

10 months ago

Definitely A and C! Those are big no-nos.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

10 months ago

I’m really unsure, but I feel like both A and C might be discouraged. I need to double-check my notes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

10 months ago

I practiced a question like this, and I think it was about limiting the number of node instances. Could it be A and B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like having more than 50 node instances is a bad practice. So maybe B and C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

11 months ago

I think I remember something about the time between activities being important. Maybe it's C and A?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

11 months ago

Ah, I see now. Less than or equal to 5 seconds between activities and more than 50 node instances are the two practices that are strongly discouraged. Got it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

11 months ago

I remember reading that more than 50 node instances is discouraged for activity chaining. And I think the ideal time between activities is more than 5 seconds. Let me double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

11 months ago

Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure less than 5 seconds between activities is recommended, so that's not a bad practice. But I'm not sure about the node instance limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

11 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the best practices for activity chaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

11 months ago

Avoiding remote control seems like a good idea, as that could add an extra layer of complexity. I'll make sure to communicate clearly and patiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Hosting sounds like it could be the right answer too. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

1 year ago

Looks like they're trying to keep those activities on a short leash!

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

1 year ago

Activity chaining? More like 'activity conga line'!

upvoted 0 times

Casie

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kimbery

1 year ago

Less than or equal to 50 node instances? Phew, I was worried they'd make us use a supercomputer for this!

upvoted 0 times

Ezekiel

1 year ago

I know right! I was relieved when I saw that too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

1 year ago

D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Willard

1 year ago

50 node instances? That's a lot! I wonder if they'll let me use my abacus to keep track of all that.

upvoted 0 times

Reena

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaniqua

1 year ago

B) More than 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dorthy

1 year ago

Ah, so more than 5 seconds is discouraged? I guess they want us to keep those activities tightly chained together.

upvoted 0 times

Sophia

1 year ago

D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

1 year ago

Yes, they want the activities to be closely linked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Herman

1 year ago

But having more than 50 node instances can lead to performance issues, so I think B is one of the correct answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe it's B and D that are discouraged.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

1 year ago

I think A and C are strongly discouraged for activity chaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Demetra

1 year ago

Hmm, I thought less than 5 seconds between activities was a good thing for activity chaining. Looks like I need to review that one.

upvoted 0 times

Raymon

1 year ago

B) More than 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...