Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 5 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 5

[All ACD200 Questions]

Which two practices are strongly discouraged for activity chaining? (Choose two.)

ALess than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

BMore than 50 node instances

CMore than 5 seconds between attended activities

DLess than or equal to 50 node instances

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Kayleigh at Dec 11, 2023, 02:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ACD200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Junita

7 months ago

Why is less than 5 seconds a bad thing? That’s surprising!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

8 months ago

Agreed, A and C are the right choices!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnna

8 months ago

Wait, are we really discouraging less than 5 seconds? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

8 months ago

I thought B was a problem too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

8 months ago

Definitely A and C! Those are big no-nos.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

8 months ago

I’m really unsure, but I feel like both A and C might be discouraged. I need to double-check my notes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

9 months ago

I practiced a question like this, and I think it was about limiting the number of node instances. Could it be A and B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like having more than 50 node instances is a bad practice. So maybe B and C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

9 months ago

I think I remember something about the time between activities being important. Maybe it's C and A?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

9 months ago

Ah, I see now. Less than or equal to 5 seconds between activities and more than 50 node instances are the two practices that are strongly discouraged. Got it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

9 months ago

I remember reading that more than 50 node instances is discouraged for activity chaining. And I think the ideal time between activities is more than 5 seconds. Let me double-check that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

9 months ago

Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure less than 5 seconds between activities is recommended, so that's not a bad practice. But I'm not sure about the node instance limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

9 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the best practices for activity chaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

9 months ago

Avoiding remote control seems like a good idea, as that could add an extra layer of complexity. I'll make sure to communicate clearly and patiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. Hosting sounds like it could be the right answer too. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

1 year ago

Looks like they're trying to keep those activities on a short leash!

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

1 year ago

Activity chaining? More like 'activity conga line'!

upvoted 0 times

Casie

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kimbery

1 year ago

Less than or equal to 50 node instances? Phew, I was worried they'd make us use a supercomputer for this!

upvoted 0 times

Ezekiel

1 year ago

I know right! I was relieved when I saw that too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desiree

1 year ago

D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Willard

1 year ago

50 node instances? That's a lot! I wonder if they'll let me use my abacus to keep track of all that.

upvoted 0 times

Reena

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaniqua

1 year ago

B) More than 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Dorthy

1 year ago

Ah, so more than 5 seconds is discouraged? I guess they want us to keep those activities tightly chained together.

upvoted 0 times

Sophia

1 year ago

D) Less than or equal to 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

1 year ago

Yes, they want the activities to be closely linked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

1 year ago

C) More than 5 seconds between attended activities

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Herman

1 year ago

But having more than 50 node instances can lead to performance issues, so I think B is one of the correct answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe it's B and D that are discouraged.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

1 year ago

I think A and C are strongly discouraged for activity chaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Demetra

1 year ago

Hmm, I thought less than 5 seconds between activities was a good thing for activity chaining. Looks like I need to review that one.

upvoted 0 times

Raymon

1 year ago

B) More than 50 node instances

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

1 year ago

A) Less than or equal to 5 seconds between attended activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

...