New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD200 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All ACD200 Questions]

You are tasked with configuring a process model to store the result of an expression rule for every item in a list.

Which process model design has the lowest memory footprint?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rolland
3 months ago
D seems like it would use a lot of memory, not a fan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying C is the best? Sounds too good to be true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
3 months ago
Not sure about that, A could be better in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
4 months ago
I agree, a!foreach is great for handling lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
4 months ago
Option C is usually the most efficient for memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
The loop of smart service nodes sounds complicated; I wonder if it would actually save memory or just add overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
4 months ago
I feel like calling a sub-process for each item could end up using more resources, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
I remember practicing with MNI, but I can't recall if it really has a lower memory footprint compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
I think using a!foreach in a script task might be the most efficient, but I'm not entirely sure about the memory implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I believe Option B with the sub-process is the way to go for the lowest memory usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
5 months ago
I think the key here is to minimize the memory footprint. Option C with the script task and !foreach seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review the process model design concepts to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the memory implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The issue seems to be that Server2 info is missing from the Leaf 101 endpoint table and the COOP database. I think the key is to find a way to ensure the ACI fabric forwards the unicast packets from Server1 to Server2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem pretty broad, and I'm not totally confident I understand the nuances of each step in a compliance inspection. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
I think the answer is C. The question specifically asks about a configuration parameter that modifies only the sender address, and sender_canonical_maps sounds like it would do that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel