New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Appian ACD101 Exam - Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Appian's ACD101 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 3
[All ACD101 Questions]

You have a record type, ABC_Author, backed by a database table.

You need to retrieve the total number of authors without loading all the data.

According to Appian best practices, which code snippet accomplishes this goal in the most efficient way?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to Appian best practices, the most efficient way to retrieve the total number of authors without loading all the data is to use a query that includes an aggregation function. Option B uses an aggregation field with a COUNT function, which is designed to return the number of rows that match a query without the need to retrieve and load all row data, thus optimizing performance.


Appian Documentation: a!queryRecordType Function

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Isadora
6 days ago
I feel like Option B balances performance and simplicity well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
11 days ago
Option C might be a bit complex. Not sure about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
16 days ago
I prefer Option A. It looks straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
21 days ago
I think Option B is the best choice. It seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
26 days ago
I’m surprised there’s no mention of performance differences!
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
1 month ago
I agree, Option A is definitely the best choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 month ago
Wait, are we sure Option C is even valid?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
1 month ago
I think Option B is better, it seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go, unless you want to watch paint dry while waiting for the query to finish.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 months ago
I have a vague memory of the best practices suggesting to avoid loading unnecessary data. I wonder if that points to option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
2 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of using aggregate functions for this kind of question. It could be option C, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
Option A is the most efficient way to get the count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
2 months ago
Option C looks the most efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
3 months ago
I agree, Option C seems to be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
3 months ago
Haha, Option A looks like it would take forever to run! Option C is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option B might be the one that uses a more efficient query.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
3 months ago
I think we practiced something similar in class about counting records without fetching all data. I hope I remember the right syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
4 months ago
This is a good test of my database knowledge. I'll need to consider factors like performance, scalability, and maintainability to determine the best approach. Time to put my critical thinking skills to work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the Appian best practices and look for the option that aligns with those guidelines the most. That should help me identify the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Retrieving the total number of authors without loading all the data seems tricky. I'll need to think through the implications of each option carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
4 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about database optimization. I'll need to carefully review the code snippets and Appian best practices to determine the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
10 hours ago
I think Option A looks promising.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel